Botswana vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre

Botswana
1.23 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.35 m3 per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
142nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
140th

Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.35 m3 per square kilometre against 1.23 m3 per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.12 m3 per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 1.03 m3 per square kilometre 0.1723 m3 per square kilometre 0.8553 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 1.04 m3 per square kilometre 0.2065 m3 per square kilometre 0.8332 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 1.09 m3 per square kilometre 0.3277 m3 per square kilometre 0.7606 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 1.09 m3 per square kilometre 0.5616 m3 per square kilometre 0.5285 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 1.16 m3 per square kilometre 0.8306 m3 per square kilometre 0.3289 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 1.23 m3 per square kilometre 1.17 m3 per square kilometre 0.0523 m3 per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 1.23 m3 per square kilometre 1.31 m3 per square kilometre 0.078 m3 per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wood fuel, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre, Botswana or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.35 m3 per square kilometre against 1.23 m3 per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in wood fuel, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre between Botswana and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.12 m3 per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for wood fuel, non-coniferous — production, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 142nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 140th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-fuel-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-fuel-non-coniferous-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Botswana vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
m3 per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,484 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wood fuel, non-coniferous — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.