Croatia vs Slovenia: Wood fuel — Production, per capita
Croatia
0.6764 m3 per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0.6785 m3 per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
27th
Slovenia rank
26th
Wood fuel — Production, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.6785 m3 per person against 0.6764 m3 per person in Croatia, a difference of 0.0021 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Croatia ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 170 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1967 m3 per person | 0.1913 m3 per person | 0.0054 m3 per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.1994 m3 per person | 0.3392 m3 per person | 0.1399 m3 per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.4219 m3 per person | 0.5847 m3 per person | 0.1628 m3 per person | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.6266 m3 per person | 0.5824 m3 per person | 0.0442 m3 per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel — production, per capita, Croatia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.6785 m3 per person against 0.6764 m3 per person in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel — production, per capita between Croatia and Slovenia?
- 0.0021 m3 per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Slovenia rank globally for wood fuel — production, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.