Eswatini vs Zambia: Wood fuel — Production, per capita
Eswatini
1.1 m3 per person
in 2024
Zambia
1.08 m3 per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
10th
Zambia rank
11th
Wood fuel — Production, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Zambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.1 m3 per person against 1.08 m3 per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.02 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 10th and Zambia ranks 11th of 170 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.9392 m3 per person | 0.8673 m3 per person | 0.0718 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 0.816 m3 per person | 0.8142 m3 per person | 0.0017 m3 per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.899 m3 per person | 1.63 m3 per person | 0.7307 m3 per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1.31 m3 per person | 1.42 m3 per person | 0.1108 m3 per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1.1 m3 per person | 1.14 m3 per person | 0.0421 m3 per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel — production, per capita, Eswatini or Zambia?
- Eswatini, at 1.1 m3 per person against 1.08 m3 per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel — production, per capita between Eswatini and Zambia?
- 0.02 m3 per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for wood fuel — production, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 10th and Zambia ranks 11th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.