Chad vs Eritrea: Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP
Chad
0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea
0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Chad rank
21st
Eritrea rank
20th
Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP in Chad, a difference of 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Chad ranks 21st and Eritrea ranks 20th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0036 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0031 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.0018 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0015 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp, Chad or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp between Chad and Eritrea?
- 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 21st and Eritrea ranks 20th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.