China vs Poland: Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP
China
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
113th
Poland rank
116th
Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Poland
How they compare
China currently reports 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Poland, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
China ranks 113th and Poland ranks 116th of 167 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp, China or Poland?
- China, at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp between China and Poland?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Poland rank globally for wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 113th and Poland ranks 116th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.