Congo vs Latvia: Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP
Congo
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Congo rank
49th
Latvia rank
51st
Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 m3 per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 51st of 167 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.0003 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 m3 per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp, Congo or Latvia?
- Congo, at 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp between Congo and Latvia?
- 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp?
- Congo ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 51st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.