Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Bhutan
0 t per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
128th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 164 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.