Brazil vs Cambodia: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Brazil
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Cambodia
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
72nd
Cambodia rank
75th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Cambodia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0006 t per person in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 72nd and Cambodia ranks 75th of 164 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0014 t per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0.0019 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0019 t per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0018 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Brazil or Cambodia?
- Brazil, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0006 t per person in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Brazil and Cambodia?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Cambodia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Cambodia rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 72nd and Cambodia ranks 75th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.