China vs Slovakia: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
China
0.022 t per person
in 2024
Slovakia
0.0309 t per person
in 2024
China rank
14th
Slovakia rank
12th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- China
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 0.0309 t per person against 0.022 t per person in China, a difference of 0.0089 t per person.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.4 times China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China ahead.
China ranks 14th and Slovakia ranks 12th of 164 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.002 t per person | 0.0058 t per person | 0.0038 t per person | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 0.0063 t per person | 0.0205 t per person | 0.0141 t per person | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.0145 t per person | 0.031 t per person | 0.0165 t per person | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0.021 t per person | 0.0301 t per person | 0.0091 t per person | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, China or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 0.0309 t per person against 0.022 t per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between China and Slovakia?
- 0.0089 t per person, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Slovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do China and Slovakia rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- China ranks 14th and Slovakia ranks 12th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.