Ghana vs Pakistan: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Ghana
0.0007 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
74th
Pakistan rank
71st
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Ghana, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 71st of 164 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Ghana or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0007 t per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Ghana and Pakistan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Pakistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Pakistan rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 71st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.