Guatemala vs Qatar: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Guatemala
0.0027 t per person
in 2024
Qatar
0.002 t per person
in 2024
Guatemala rank
54th
Qatar rank
56th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Qatar
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.0027 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Qatar, a difference of 0.0007 t per person.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.4 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 54th and Qatar ranks 56th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Guatemala or Qatar?
- Guatemala, at 0.0027 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Guatemala and Qatar?
- 0.0007 t per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Qatar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Qatar rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 54th and Qatar ranks 56th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.