Italy vs Slovenia: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Italy
0.0569 t per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0.114 t per person
in 2024
Italy rank
4th
Slovenia rank
1st
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Italy
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.114 t per person against 0.0569 t per person in Italy, a difference of 0.0571 t per person.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 2.0 times Italy's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 4th and Slovenia ranks 1st of 164 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0511 t per person | 0.0703 t per person | 0.0192 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0579 t per person | 0.0972 t per person | 0.0394 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.0569 t per person | 0.109 t per person | 0.052 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.0565 t per person | 0.1232 t per person | 0.0667 t per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Italy or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.114 t per person against 0.0569 t per person in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Italy and Slovenia?
- 0.0571 t per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Slovenia rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Italy ranks 4th and Slovenia ranks 1st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.