Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0008 t per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
70th
Pakistan rank
71st
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Pakistan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 70th and Pakistan ranks 71st of 164 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Kazakhstan or Pakistan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0008 t per person against 0.0008 t per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 0 t per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Pakistan rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 70th and Pakistan ranks 71st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.