Lithuania vs Tunisia: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita
Lithuania
0.012 t per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0119 t per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
26th
Tunisia rank
27th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.012 t per person against 0.0119 t per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 27th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0054 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0077 t per person | 0.0056 t per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0136 t per person | 0.0098 t per person | 0.0038 t per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.0144 t per person | 0.009 t per person | 0.0054 t per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per capita, Lithuania or Tunisia?
- Lithuania, at 0.012 t per person against 0.0119 t per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per capita between Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Tunisia rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 27th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.