China vs Jordan: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
China
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jordan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
5th
Jordan rank
3rd
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.5 times China's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 5th and Jordan ranks 3rd of 163 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp, China or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp between China and Jordan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do China and Jordan rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 5th and Jordan ranks 3rd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.