Luxembourg vs Sudan: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
138th
Sudan rank
139th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Sudan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 138th and Sudan ranks 139th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Sudan?
- Luxembourg, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Sudan rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 138th and Sudan ranks 139th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.