Malta vs Montenegro: Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP
Malta
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Montenegro
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta rank
143rd
Montenegro rank
145th
Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- Malta
- Montenegro
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Montenegro, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 143rd and Montenegro ranks 145th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp, Malta or Montenegro?
- Malta, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp between Malta and Montenegro?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Montenegro rank globally for wood pulp — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Malta ranks 143rd and Montenegro ranks 145th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.