Belgium-Luxembourg vs Serbia and Montenegro: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate
Belgium-Luxembourg
32.79 % change on previous year
in 1999
Serbia and Montenegro
41.29 % change on previous year
in 2005
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
26th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
23rd
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 41.29 % change on previous year against 32.79 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 8.5 % change on previous year.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 26th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate, Belgium-Luxembourg or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 41.29 % change on previous year against 32.79 % change on previous year in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2005.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate between Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 8.5 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 26th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 23rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.