Gambia vs Sudan: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate
Gambia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sudan
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Gambia rank
81st
Sudan rank
81st
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate over time
- Gambia
- Sudan
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sudan ahead.
Gambia ranks 81st and Sudan ranks 81st of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -13.87 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 13.87 % change on previous year | Sudan |
| 2020s | 225 % change on previous year | 3.46 % change on previous year | 221.54 % change on previous year | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate, Gambia or Sudan?
- Gambia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate between Gambia and Sudan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Sudan rank globally for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate?
- Gambia ranks 81st and Sudan ranks 81st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.