Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs New Zealand: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
-12.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
73.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
9th
New Zealand rank
10th

Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • New Zealand
02505007501.0k196219932024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 73.07 % change on previous year against -12.46 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 85.53 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 5.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 10th of 15 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 126.18 % change on previous year 9.69 % change on previous year 116.48 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 14.08 % change on previous year 25.89 % change on previous year 11.81 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s 3.02 % change on previous year 16.6 % change on previous year 13.58 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 23.31 % change on previous year 48.66 % change on previous year 25.35 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 26.91 % change on previous year 25.31 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 9.09 % change on previous year 13.51 % change on previous year 4.42 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 73.07 % change on previous year against -12.46 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and New Zealand?
85.53 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for wood pulp — import value, annual growth rate?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 10th of 15 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs New Zealand: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-pulp-import-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/wood-pulp-import-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/new-zealand/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs New Zealand: Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wood pulp — Import value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 8,778 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wood pulp — Import value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.