Cambodia vs Libya: Wood pulp — Import value, per capita
Cambodia
0.0005 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Libya
0.0005 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Cambodia rank
81st
Libya rank
82nd
Wood pulp — Import value, per capita over time
- Cambodia
- Libya
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0.0005 1000 USD per person against 0.0005 1000 USD per person in Libya, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Cambodia ranks 81st and Libya ranks 82nd of 164 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0001 1000 USD per person | 0.0002 1000 USD per person | 0.0001 1000 USD per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import value, per capita, Cambodia or Libya?
- Cambodia, at 0.0005 1000 USD per person against 0.0005 1000 USD per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, per capita between Cambodia and Libya?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Libya rank globally for wood pulp — import value, per capita?
- Cambodia ranks 81st and Libya ranks 82nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.