Georgia vs Namibia: Wood pulp — Import value, per capita
Georgia
0.0001 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0001 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
115th
Namibia rank
117th
Wood pulp — Import value, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 117th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0002 1000 USD per person | 0.0002 1000 USD per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0004 1000 USD per person | 0.0003 1000 USD per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import value, per capita, Georgia or Namibia?
- Georgia, at 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, per capita between Georgia and Namibia?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for wood pulp — import value, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 117th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.