Myanmar vs Yemen: Wood pulp — Import value, per capita
Myanmar
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Yemen
0 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Myanmar rank
131st
Yemen rank
133rd
Wood pulp — Import value, per capita over time
- Myanmar
- Yemen
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Yemen, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Yemen ahead.
Myanmar ranks 131st and Yemen ranks 133rd of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0001 1000 USD per person | 0.0001 1000 USD per person | Yemen |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per person | 0.0001 1000 USD per person | 0 1000 USD per person | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wood pulp — import value, per capita, Myanmar or Yemen?
- Myanmar, at 0 1000 USD per person against 0 1000 USD per person in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wood pulp — import value, per capita between Myanmar and Yemen?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Yemen?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Yemen rank globally for wood pulp — import value, per capita?
- Myanmar ranks 131st and Yemen ranks 133rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wood pulp — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wood pulp — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.