15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land in Comoros

Comoros: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land was 84.1 % in 2021. ▬ Flat

Latest (2021)
84.1 %
Change on year
down 0.4%
World rank
36th
of 145 countries
All-time high
86.12 %
in 2000
All-time low
84.1 %
in 2021
Years of data
6
2000–2021

15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land in Comoros, 2000–2021

0204060802000201020212000: 86.1 %2005: 85.9 %2010: 85.8 %2015: 84.9 %2018: 84.4 %2021: 84.1 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2021, 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land in Comoros stood at 84.1 %. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land in Comoros peaked at 86.12 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 84.1 %, in 2021.

Comoros ranks 36th of 145 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land in Comoros, year by year

Annual values for 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value in Comoros, 2000 to 2021.
Year % Change
2000 86.12 %
2005 85.94 % -0.2%
2010 85.76 % -0.2%
2015 84.93 % -1.0%
2018 84.43 % -0.6%
2021 84.1 % -0.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 86.03 % 85.94 % 86.12 % 2
2010s 85.04 % 84.43 % 85.76 % 3
2020s 84.1 % 84.1 % 84.1 % 1

Countries ranked near Comoros

  1. 33 Central African Republic 85.92 % compare
  2. 34 Philippines 84.42 % compare
  3. 35 Republic of Korea 84.36 % compare
  4. 37 Sri Lanka 83.47 % compare
  5. 38 Jamaica 83.16 % compare
  6. 39 Costa Rica 81.63 % compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More environment data for Comoros

All data for Comoros →

Frequently asked questions

What is 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land in Comoros?
15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land in Comoros was 84.1 % in 2021, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land recorded in Comoros?
The highest recorded value was 86.12 % in 2000.
What is the lowest 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land recorded in Comoros?
The lowest recorded value was 84.1 % in 2021.
How does Comoros rank for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land?
Comoros ranks 36th out of 145 countries with data for 2021.
Is 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: remaining moutain area; land rising or falling in Comoros?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Comoros data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land in Comoros. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-remaining-moutain-area-land-cover-tree-covered-areas/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-remaining-moutain-area-land-cover-tree-covered-areas/comoros/">15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land in Comoros</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Remaining moutain area; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 1,080 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.