6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value in Republic of Moldova
Republic of Moldova: 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value was 33.6 USD/m3 in 2023. ▲ Rising
6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value in Republic of Moldova, 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in USD/m3.
Analysis
In 2023, 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value in Republic of Moldova stood at 33.6 USD/m3.
That represents a change of down 3.3% on the previous year and up 16.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value in Republic of Moldova peaked at 34.73 USD/m3 in 2022 and was at its lowest, 11.25 USD/m3, in 2000.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.
6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value in Republic of Moldova, year by year
| Year | USD/m3 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 11.25 USD/m3 | — |
| 2001 | 12.55 USD/m3 | +11.6% |
| 2002 | 14.07 USD/m3 | +12.1% |
| 2003 | 15.36 USD/m3 | +9.2% |
| 2004 | 17.66 USD/m3 | +15.0% |
| 2005 | 19.5 USD/m3 | +10.4% |
| 2006 | 21.22 USD/m3 | +8.8% |
| 2007 | 23.53 USD/m3 | +10.9% |
| 2008 | 25.89 USD/m3 | +10.0% |
| 2009 | 25.85 USD/m3 | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 26.04 USD/m3 | +0.7% |
| 2011 | 27.12 USD/m3 | +4.1% |
| 2012 | 27.39 USD/m3 | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 28.97 USD/m3 | +5.8% |
| 2014 | 29.43 USD/m3 | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 30.04 USD/m3 | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 31.5 USD/m3 | +4.9% |
| 2017 | 32.4 USD/m3 | +2.9% |
| 2018 | 33.22 USD/m3 | +2.5% |
| 2019 | 34.24 USD/m3 | +3.1% |
| 2020 | 29.79 USD/m3 | -13.0% |
| 2021 | 34.26 USD/m3 | +15.0% |
| 2022 | 34.73 USD/m3 | +1.4% |
| 2023 | 33.6 USD/m3 | -3.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.69 USD/m3 | 11.25 USD/m3 | 25.89 USD/m3 | 10 |
| 2010s | 30.04 USD/m3 | 26.04 USD/m3 | 34.24 USD/m3 | 10 |
| 2020s | 33.09 USD/m3 | 29.79 USD/m3 | 34.73 USD/m3 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova
- 8 Sweden 555.92 USD/m3 compare
- 9 Belgium 523.25 USD/m3 compare
- 10 Liechtenstein 504.84 USD/m3 compare
- 11 Australia 494.56 USD/m3 compare
- 12 Australia and New Zealand 445.12 USD/m3 compare
- 13 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 377.22 USD/m3 compare
- 14 France 370.74 USD/m3 compare
More environment data for Republic of Moldova
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Temperature change 1.95 °C (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.733 °C (2025)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production 3.27 g/Int$ (2024)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use 6,770 t (2024)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per area of cropland 3.25 kg/ha (2024)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area 217.5 1000 ha (2024)
- Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area 10.06 % (2024)
- Inland waters — Area 94.3 1000 ha (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural 7.17 g/Int$ (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value in Republic of Moldova?
- 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value in Republic of Moldova was 33.6 USD/m3 in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 34.73 USD/m3 in 2022.
- What is the lowest 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.25 USD/m3 in 2000.
- How does Republic of Moldova rank for 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 11th out of 15 regions with data for 2023.
- Is 6.4.1 water use efficiency (services (g to t)) — value rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 6.4.1 Water Use Efficiency (Services (G to T)) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.