Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo
Congo: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre was 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo is 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 69.7% on the previous year and up 256.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo peaked at 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Congo 166th out of 216 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo, year by year
| Year | metric tons per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre | +33.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1991 | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre | -48.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | -65.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | -73.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre | +760.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2011 | 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2015 | 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2017 | 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0026 metric tons per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0027 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0029 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre | +69.7% |
Congo compared with similar countries
- Congo's 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0663 metric tons per square kilometre, 7% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Congo's 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre, 62% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | +760.0% | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0026 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 163 Papua New Guinea 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 164 Gambia 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 165 Morocco 0.0053 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 167 Samoa 0.0048 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 168 Burkina Faso 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 169 Luxembourg 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre compare
More environment data for Congo
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -9.96 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -6.68 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.202 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.13 °C (2025)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual -3.35 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) 1.96 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo?
- Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Congo was 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Congo rank for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 166th out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 256.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Aquaculture production (metric tons) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Aquaculture production Food and Agriculture Organization., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.