Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola

Angola: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita was 0.0161 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0.0161 metric tons per person
Change on year
up 7.0%
World rank
68th
of 216 countries
All-time high
0.0983 metric tons per person
in 1972
All-time low
0.0083 metric tons per person
in 1986
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola, 1960–2024

00.020.040.060.080.1196019922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.

Analysis

Angola recorded 0.0161 metric tons per person for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.0% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola peaked at 0.0983 metric tons per person in 1972 and was at its lowest, 0.0083 metric tons per person, in 1986.

That places Angola 68th out of 216 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola, year by year

Annual values for Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola, 1960 to 2024.
Year metric tons per person Change
1960 0.0492 metric tons per person
1961 0.0466 metric tons per person -5.3%
1962 0.0513 metric tons per person +10.2%
1963 0.0454 metric tons per person -11.6%
1964 0.0662 metric tons per person +46.1%
1965 0.0477 metric tons per person -28.0%
1966 0.0601 metric tons per person +26.0%
1967 0.0531 metric tons per person -11.7%
1968 0.0532 metric tons per person +0.2%
1969 0.0738 metric tons per person +38.8%
1970 0.064 metric tons per person -13.3%
1971 0.0541 metric tons per person -15.4%
1972 0.0983 metric tons per person +81.5%
1973 0.0749 metric tons per person -23.7%
1974 0.0605 metric tons per person -19.3%
1975 0.0235 metric tons per person -61.2%
1976 0.0115 metric tons per person -50.9%
1977 0.0165 metric tons per person +42.8%
1978 0.0166 metric tons per person +0.8%
1979 0.0144 metric tons per person -13.1%
1980 0.0105 metric tons per person -27.4%
1981 0.0155 metric tons per person +48.4%
1982 0.0127 metric tons per person -17.9%
1983 0.0122 metric tons per person -4.6%
1984 0.0101 metric tons per person -16.9%
1985 0.0102 metric tons per person +1.4%
1986 0.0083 metric tons per person -18.4%
1987 0.0102 metric tons per person +22.6%
1988 0.0116 metric tons per person +13.3%
1989 0.0122 metric tons per person +5.4%
1990 0.0114 metric tons per person -6.4%
1991 0.0097 metric tons per person -14.9%
1992 0.0091 metric tons per person -6.1%
1993 0.0098 metric tons per person +7.6%
1994 0.01 metric tons per person +1.6%
1995 0.009 metric tons per person -10.3%
1996 0.0097 metric tons per person +8.5%
1997 0.01 metric tons per person +2.6%
1998 0.0108 metric tons per person +7.8%
1999 0.0112 metric tons per person +4.3%
2000 0.0148 metric tons per person +31.7%
2001 0.0152 metric tons per person +2.8%
2002 0.0147 metric tons per person -3.0%
2003 0.0118 metric tons per person -19.8%
2004 0.0129 metric tons per person +9.2%
2005 0.0105 metric tons per person -18.6%
2006 0.0113 metric tons per person +7.4%
2007 0.0147 metric tons per person +30.8%
2008 0.0142 metric tons per person -3.9%
2009 0.0121 metric tons per person -14.4%
2010 0.0133 metric tons per person +9.6%
2011 0.0141 metric tons per person +6.1%
2012 0.0149 metric tons per person +5.2%
2013 0.0156 metric tons per person +4.7%
2014 0.0163 metric tons per person +4.6%
2015 0.0176 metric tons per person +8.1%
2016 0.0167 metric tons per person -5.2%
2017 0.0176 metric tons per person +5.5%
2018 0.0142 metric tons per person -19.5%
2019 0.0124 metric tons per person -12.5%
2020 0.0112 metric tons per person -9.6%
2021 0.0165 metric tons per person +47.0%
2022 0.0151 metric tons per person -8.1%
2023 0.015 metric tons per person -0.6%
2024 0.0161 metric tons per person +7.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0546 metric tons per person 0.0454 metric tons per person 0.0738 metric tons per person 10
1970s 0.0434 metric tons per person 0.0115 metric tons per person 0.0983 metric tons per person 10
1980s 0.0114 metric tons per person 0.0083 metric tons per person 0.0155 metric tons per person 10
1990s 0.0101 metric tons per person 0.009 metric tons per person 0.0114 metric tons per person 10
2000s 0.0132 metric tons per person 0.0105 metric tons per person 0.0152 metric tons per person 10
2010s 0.0152 metric tons per person 0.0124 metric tons per person 0.0176 metric tons per person 10
2020s 0.0148 metric tons per person 0.0112 metric tons per person 0.0165 metric tons per person 5

Countries ranked near Angola

  1. 65 Canada 0.0165 metric tons per person compare
  2. 66 Netherlands 0.0165 metric tons per person compare
  3. 67 Sri Lanka 0.0162 metric tons per person compare
  4. 69 Curacao 0.0157 metric tons per person compare
  5. 70 Spain 0.0156 metric tons per person compare
  6. 71 Dominica 0.0149 metric tons per person compare

See the full ranking of 264 places →

More environment data for Angola

All data for Angola →

Frequently asked questions

What is capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola?
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola was 0.0161 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita recorded in Angola?
The highest recorded value was 0.0983 metric tons per person in 1972.
What is the lowest capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita recorded in Angola?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0083 metric tons per person in 1986.
How does Angola rank for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita?
Angola ranks 68th out of 216 countries with data for 2024.
Is capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita rising or falling in Angola?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Angola data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/angola/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/capture-fisheries-production-metric-tons-per-capita/angola/">Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita in Angola</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.