Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre was 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre
Change on year
up 22.1%
World rank
172nd
of 216 countries
All-time high
0.1145 metric tons per square kilometre
in 1985
All-time low
0.033 metric tons per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil is 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 22.1% on the previous year and down 9.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 0.1145 metric tons per square kilometre in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0.033 metric tons per square kilometre, in 1961.
Brazil ranks 172nd of 216 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | metric tons per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.033 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0402 metric tons per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0442 metric tons per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1965 | 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1966 | 0.0471 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0503 metric tons per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0593 metric tons per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1969 | 0.059 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0735 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0743 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 0.091 metric tons per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0856 metric tons per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0902 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1976 | 0.079 metric tons per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0876 metric tons per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0902 metric tons per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0936 metric tons per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0964 metric tons per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0965 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0987 metric tons per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1983 | 0.1044 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1984 | 0.1137 metric tons per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 0.1145 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1986 | 0.1133 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1987 | 0.1118 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0975 metric tons per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1989 | 0.0934 metric tons per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0742 metric tons per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0776 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0767 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0782 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0855 metric tons per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0727 metric tons per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0738 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1997 | 0.078 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1998 | 0.0729 metric tons per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1999 | 0.073 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0811 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0875 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0911 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0868 metric tons per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0902 metric tons per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0898 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0933 metric tons per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0951 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0956 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0998 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0941 metric tons per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0921 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0987 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0948 metric tons per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0931 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0872 metric tons per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0758 metric tons per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0652 metric tons per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0664 metric tons per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0585 metric tons per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2021 | 0.064 metric tons per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0703 metric tons per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre | +22.1% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.5348 metric tons per square kilometre, 16% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.9469 metric tons per square kilometre, 9% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0472 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.033 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0593 metric tons per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0834 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0687 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0936 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.104 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0934 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1145 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0762 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0727 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0855 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0911 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0811 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0998 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0836 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0652 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0987 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0697 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0585 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 169 Iraq 0.0971 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 170 Mali 0.0922 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 171 Chad 0.0866 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 173 Canada 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 174 South Sudan 0.0791 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 175 Bulgaria 0.0618 metric tons per square kilometre compare
More environment data for Brazil
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -6.93 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -8.24 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.221 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.36 °C (2025)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual -1.85 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) 2.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre in Brazil was 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1145 metric tons per square kilometre in 1985.
- What is the lowest capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.033 metric tons per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Brazil rank for capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 172nd out of 216 countries with data for 2023.
- Is capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Capture fisheries production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Capture fisheries production (metric tons) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Capture fisheries production Food and Agriculture Organization., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Capture fisheries production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.