Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP in Portugal
Portugal: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP in Portugal, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Portugal recorded 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.5% on the previous year and down 21.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp in Portugal peaked at 0.0047 kg per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Portugal 60th out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP in Portugal, year by year
| Year | kg per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0047 kg per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0045 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0042 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0039 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0031 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0026 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1971 | 0.002 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0017 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP | -24.4% |
| 1974 | 0.001 kg per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1977 | 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1979 | 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 1980 | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP | +11.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | -27.1% |
| 1987 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1990 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -23.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +6.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +19.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +5.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 kg per US$ of GDP, 2.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0035 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0047 kg per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
More environment data for Portugal
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -0.6043 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -0.5127 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.44 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.15 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 3.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual -3.29 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate 0.1607 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp in Portugal?
- Cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp in Portugal was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0047 kg per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Portugal rank for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
- Portugal ranks 60th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cattle — Losses from manure treated Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.