Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per unit of GDP (unit) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per unit of GDP (unit) was 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per unit of GDP in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP for cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.8% on the previous year and down 42.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador peaked at 0.0411 kg per US$ of GDP in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Ecuador 67th out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per unit of GDP (unit) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | kg per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0318 kg per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0411 kg per US$ of GDP | +29.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0383 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1964 | 0.031 kg per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0307 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0345 kg per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0334 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0332 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0281 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0311 kg per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 1971 | 0.031 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0269 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0222 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0132 kg per US$ of GDP | -40.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0115 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0102 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1977 | 0.009 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0085 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0073 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0062 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0052 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 1982 | 0.006 kg per US$ of GDP | +14.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0071 kg per US$ of GDP | +18.8% |
| 1984 | 0.0079 kg per US$ of GDP | +11.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0082 kg per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0093 kg per US$ of GDP | +12.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0105 kg per US$ of GDP | +13.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0115 kg per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0112 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0107 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1991 | 0.01 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1992 | 0.0097 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0095 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0081 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0076 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0077 kg per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0072 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0067 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0096 kg per US$ of GDP | +43.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0095 kg per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0072 kg per US$ of GDP | -23.8% |
| 2002 | 0.0068 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0059 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0053 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0046 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0041 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0035 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0029 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0032 kg per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0028 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0019 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | +13.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP, 2.3× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0336 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0281 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0411 kg per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0171 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0073 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0311 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0083 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0052 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0115 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0087 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0067 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0107 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0053 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0029 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0095 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0028 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -0.5742 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 1.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.14 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador?
- Cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador was 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0411 kg per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- What is the lowest cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Ecuador rank for cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 67th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle — manure left on pasture (n content), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cattle — Manure left on pasture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cattle — Manure left on pasture (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.