Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … annual in Serbia
Serbia: Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … annual was -9.09 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth in Serbia, 2007–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth in Serbia stood at -9.09 % change on previous year. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of down 54.7% on the previous year and down 96.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth in Serbia peaked at 1.5 % change on previous year in 2019 and was at its lowest, -9.09 % change on previous year, in 2023.
Serbia ranks 196th of 209 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … annual in Serbia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | -3.99 % change on previous year | — |
| 2008 | -3.02 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 2009 | -6.3 % change on previous year | +108.4% |
| 2010 | -3.28 % change on previous year | -48.0% |
| 2011 | -2.01 % change on previous year | -38.7% |
| 2012 | -1.53 % change on previous year | -23.9% |
| 2013 | -4.62 % change on previous year | +202.8% |
| 2014 | 1.33 % change on previous year | -128.8% |
| 2015 | -2.54 % change on previous year | -291.1% |
| 2016 | -2.01 % change on previous year | -21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.714 % change on previous year | -135.6% |
| 2018 | -1.78 % change on previous year | -349.3% |
| 2019 | 1.5 % change on previous year | -184.4% |
| 2020 | -1.27 % change on previous year | -184.5% |
| 2021 | -3.26 % change on previous year | +156.8% |
| 2022 | -5.88 % change on previous year | +80.1% |
| 2023 | -9.09 % change on previous year | +54.7% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's -9.09 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0238 % change on previous year, 382.1× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Serbia's -9.09 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1.61 % change on previous year, 5.7× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -4.44 % change on previous year | -6.3 % change on previous year | -3.02 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 2010s | -1.42 % change on previous year | -4.62 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.88 % change on previous year | -9.09 % change on previous year | -1.27 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 193 Georgia -7.47 % change on previous year compare
- 194 Lesotho -8.49 % change on previous year compare
- 195 Botswana -8.81 % change on previous year compare
- 197 Albania -9.81 % change on previous year compare
- 198 Palestine -10.21 % change on previous year compare
- 199 Armenia -10.24 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Serbia
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.51 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -4.72 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.594 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.12 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 10.88 % change on previous year (2024)
- Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate 3.99 % change on previous year (2024)
- Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita 0.001 metric tons per person (2024)
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons), annual growth rate 1.01 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth in Serbia?
- Cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth in Serbia was -9.09 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 % change on previous year in 2019.
- What is the lowest cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -9.09 % change on previous year in 2023.
- How does Serbia rank for cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth?
- Serbia ranks 196th out of 209 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle — manure management (manure treated, n content), annual growth rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 96.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cattle — Manure management Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.