Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per unit of GDP in Russia
Russia: Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per unit of GDP in Russia, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Russia recorded 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP for chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp in 2024.
That represents a change of down 41.1% on the previous year and down 71.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp in Russia peaked at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, in 1994.
Russia ranks 112th of 171 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per unit of GDP in Russia, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -90.1% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -100.0% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +36.6% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +39.7% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +161.7% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -40.7% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -53.6% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +53.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +28.9% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -28.7% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +45.6% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +15.2% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +8.8% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +17.9% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +36.6% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +28.1% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -53.8% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -46.1% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | -41.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russia
More environment data for Russia
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -1.76 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -3.18 Percentage change (2025)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 2.5 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.96 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual 0.5219 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp in Russia?
- Chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp in Russia was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in 1994.
- How does Russia rank for chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp?
- Russia ranks 112th out of 171 countries with data for 2024.
- Is chemical wood pulp — import value, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Chemical wood pulp — Import value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Chemical wood pulp — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Chemical wood pulp — Import value ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Chemical wood pulp — Import value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Chemical wood pulp — Import value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.