Chickens: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Chickens: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit was 0 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 kg per US$ of GDP
Change on year
up 2.0%
World rank
109th
of 167 countries
All-time high
0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2008
All-time low
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023

000000.001196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

In 2023, chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of in Zimbabwe stood at 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The figure is up 2.0% on the previous year and down 42.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 kg per US$ of GDP, in 2017.

That places Zimbabwe 109th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Chickens: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, 1961 to 2023.
Year kg per US$ of GDP Change
1961 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP —
1962 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP -0.6%
1963 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP -2.4%
1964 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP -3.0%
1965 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP -6.1%
1966 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP +3.6%
1967 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP -6.9%
1968 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP -4.3%
1969 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP -14.2%
1970 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP -4.7%
1971 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP -10.1%
1972 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -16.5%
1973 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -18.1%
1974 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -15.9%
1975 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -7.8%
1976 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +2.6%
1977 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +0.4%
1978 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +1.8%
1979 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -18.0%
1980 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -24.4%
1981 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -15.4%
1982 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -5.3%
1983 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +11.6%
1984 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +14.8%
1985 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +0.2%
1986 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -4.1%
1987 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +1.9%
1988 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +4.3%
1989 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +3.6%
1990 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -3.6%
1991 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +10.0%
1992 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +32.9%
1993 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -0.9%
1994 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +2.5%
1995 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +3.9%
1996 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -16.9%
1997 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -6.5%
1998 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +38.0%
1999 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -0.1%
2000 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +15.3%
2001 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP +11.2%
2002 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP +16.5%
2003 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP +20.6%
2004 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP +6.8%
2005 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP +4.7%
2006 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP +9.6%
2007 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP +9.8%
2008 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP +17.9%
2009 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -54.5%
2010 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP -34.0%
2011 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -22.4%
2012 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -26.0%
2013 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -20.5%
2014 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP -14.8%
2015 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +3.1%
2016 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP +0.3%
2017 0 kg per US$ of GDP -58.2%
2018 0 kg per US$ of GDP +43.1%
2019 0 kg per US$ of GDP +13.5%
2020 0 kg per US$ of GDP +2.9%
2021 0 kg per US$ of GDP -16.8%
2022 0 kg per US$ of GDP +10.3%
2023 0 kg per US$ of GDP +2.0%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 0 kg per US$ of GDP is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, 48% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 0 kg per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, 76% of the median. (43 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 9
1970s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 10
1980s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 10
1990s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 10
2000s 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 4

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 106 Kuwait 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 107 Nigeria 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 108 Kazakhstan 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 110 Palestine 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 111 New Zealand 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 112 Chile 0 kg per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 169 places →

More environment data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of in Zimbabwe?
Chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of in Zimbabwe was 0 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP in 2008.
What is the lowest chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kg per US$ of GDP in 2017.
How does Zimbabwe rank for chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of?
Zimbabwe ranks 109th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
Is chickens — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 42.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/zimbabwe/">Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content) ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,049 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.