Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area was 3.19 kg/ha in 2023. ▼ Falling
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago, 1961–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kg/ha.
Analysis
Trinidad and Tobago recorded 3.19 kg/ha for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 14.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 13.17 kg/ha in 1968 and was at its lowest, 2.66 kg/ha, in 2009.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 156th of 186 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | kg/ha | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 13.08 kg/ha | — |
| 1962 | 11.6 kg/ha | -11.3% |
| 1963 | 12.9 kg/ha | +11.2% |
| 1964 | 12.02 kg/ha | -6.8% |
| 1965 | 12.92 kg/ha | +7.5% |
| 1966 | 12.2 kg/ha | -5.6% |
| 1967 | 11.86 kg/ha | -2.8% |
| 1968 | 13.17 kg/ha | +11.0% |
| 1969 | 13.04 kg/ha | -1.0% |
| 1970 | 12.91 kg/ha | -1.0% |
| 1971 | 11.99 kg/ha | -7.1% |
| 1972 | 12.91 kg/ha | +7.6% |
| 1973 | 9.79 kg/ha | -24.2% |
| 1974 | 8.88 kg/ha | -9.3% |
| 1975 | 9.22 kg/ha | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 10.95 kg/ha | +18.8% |
| 1977 | 9.61 kg/ha | -12.2% |
| 1978 | 8.01 kg/ha | -16.7% |
| 1979 | 8.31 kg/ha | +3.7% |
| 1980 | 8.02 kg/ha | -3.5% |
| 1981 | 7.2 kg/ha | -10.2% |
| 1982 | 7.64 kg/ha | +6.1% |
| 1983 | 8.15 kg/ha | +6.7% |
| 1984 | 7.23 kg/ha | -11.3% |
| 1985 | 7.89 kg/ha | +9.2% |
| 1986 | 8.52 kg/ha | +7.9% |
| 1987 | 8.48 kg/ha | -0.4% |
| 1988 | 8.7 kg/ha | +2.6% |
| 1989 | 8.47 kg/ha | -2.7% |
| 1990 | 9.49 kg/ha | +12.0% |
| 1991 | 8.46 kg/ha | -10.8% |
| 1992 | 8.59 kg/ha | +1.5% |
| 1993 | 8.1 kg/ha | -5.7% |
| 1994 | 8.6 kg/ha | +6.2% |
| 1995 | 8.34 kg/ha | -3.0% |
| 1996 | 8.93 kg/ha | +7.0% |
| 1997 | 9.16 kg/ha | +2.6% |
| 1998 | 7.93 kg/ha | -13.5% |
| 1999 | 8.83 kg/ha | +11.4% |
| 2000 | 9.46 kg/ha | +7.1% |
| 2001 | 8.61 kg/ha | -8.9% |
| 2002 | 10.9 kg/ha | +26.5% |
| 2003 | 7.49 kg/ha | -31.3% |
| 2004 | 6.36 kg/ha | -15.1% |
| 2005 | 5.68 kg/ha | -10.7% |
| 2006 | 8.62 kg/ha | +51.8% |
| 2007 | 8.31 kg/ha | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 2.93 kg/ha | -64.8% |
| 2009 | 2.66 kg/ha | -9.3% |
| 2010 | 2.7 kg/ha | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 2.9 kg/ha | +7.5% |
| 2012 | 3 kg/ha | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 2.79 kg/ha | -6.9% |
| 2014 | 3.18 kg/ha | +14.0% |
| 2015 | 3.11 kg/ha | -2.2% |
| 2016 | 2.99 kg/ha | -3.8% |
| 2017 | 3.26 kg/ha | +8.9% |
| 2018 | 3.27 kg/ha | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 3.3 kg/ha | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 3.26 kg/ha | -1.4% |
| 2021 | 3.21 kg/ha | -1.5% |
| 2022 | 3.19 kg/ha | -0.7% |
| 2023 | 3.19 kg/ha | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.53 kg/ha | 11.6 kg/ha | 13.17 kg/ha | 9 |
| 1970s | 10.26 kg/ha | 8.01 kg/ha | 12.91 kg/ha | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.03 kg/ha | 7.2 kg/ha | 8.7 kg/ha | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.64 kg/ha | 7.93 kg/ha | 9.49 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.1 kg/ha | 2.66 kg/ha | 10.9 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.05 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | 3.3 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.21 kg/ha | 3.19 kg/ha | 3.26 kg/ha | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
More environment data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -1.54 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.36 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.27 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.79 °C (2025)
- Newsprint — Import quantity, gaps filled 2,279 t (2024)
- Newsprint — Import quantity, annual growth rate 5.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Newsprint — Import value, gaps filled 1,760 1000 USD (2024)
- Newsprint — Import value, annual growth rate -6.63 % change on previous year (2024)
- Printing and writing papers — Import quantity, annual growth rate -15.15 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area in Trinidad and Tobago was 3.19 kg/ha in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 13.17 kg/ha in 1968.
- What is the lowest crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.66 kg/ha in 2009.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 156th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus per unit area rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).