Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP in Belarus
Belarus: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, cropland — area, per unit of gdp in Belarus stood at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 33 years on record.
The figure is down 8.7% on the previous year and down 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cropland — area, per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Belarus ranks 45th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year
| Year | 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 1994 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +11.2% |
| 1995 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +7.0% |
| 1996 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +25.3% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.8% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -23.3% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -23.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +20.0% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +39.9% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +18.4% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, 2.8× the median. (52 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, 7.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 42 Argentina 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 43 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 44 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 46 Yemen 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 47 Solomon Islands 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 48 Kenya 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Belarus
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -0.1734 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -0.1993 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.869 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.57 °C (2025)
- Cropland — Area, annual growth rate -0.9711 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cropland — Area, per capita 0.0006 1000 ha per person (2024)
- Arable land — Area, annual growth rate -0.8531 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arable land — Area, per capita 0.0006 1000 ha per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cropland — area, per unit of gdp in Belarus?
- Cropland — area, per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cropland — area, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest cropland — area, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Belarus rank for cropland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 45th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cropland — area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cropland — Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cropland — Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.