Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset
Bath and North East Somerset: Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly was -5.2 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset, 1950–2025
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.
Analysis
In 2025, drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset stood at -5.2 Percentage change.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 620.0% on the previous year and down 62.5% over five years.
Over the whole period, drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset peaked at 7.7 Percentage change in 1988 and was at its lowest, -16.4 Percentage change, in 1961.
Bath and North East Somerset ranks 874th of 1315 regions on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset, year by year
| Year | Percentage change | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1950 | -0.6 Percentage change | — |
| 1951 | 3.5 Percentage change | -683.3% |
| 1952 | -1.9 Percentage change | -154.3% |
| 1953 | 4.6 Percentage change | -342.1% |
| 1954 | 1.1 Percentage change | -76.1% |
| 1955 | -15.9 Percentage change | -1545.5% |
| 1956 | -8 Percentage change | -49.7% |
| 1957 | -10.8 Percentage change | +35.0% |
| 1958 | -1.2 Percentage change | -88.9% |
| 1959 | -10.3 Percentage change | +758.3% |
| 1960 | -2 Percentage change | -80.6% |
| 1961 | -16.4 Percentage change | +720.0% |
| 1962 | -7.3 Percentage change | -55.5% |
| 1963 | 1 Percentage change | -113.7% |
| 1964 | -7.7 Percentage change | -870.0% |
| 1965 | -2.7 Percentage change | -64.9% |
| 1966 | 0.5 Percentage change | -118.5% |
| 1967 | 2.5 Percentage change | +400.0% |
| 1968 | 2.8 Percentage change | +12.0% |
| 1969 | -3.2 Percentage change | -214.3% |
| 1970 | -1.8 Percentage change | -43.8% |
| 1971 | 3 Percentage change | -266.7% |
| 1972 | -0.5 Percentage change | -116.7% |
| 1973 | -1.7 Percentage change | +240.0% |
| 1974 | 2.4 Percentage change | -241.2% |
| 1975 | -6.5 Percentage change | -370.8% |
| 1976 | -9.4 Percentage change | +44.6% |
| 1977 | 1.5 Percentage change | -116.0% |
| 1978 | -3.3 Percentage change | -320.0% |
| 1979 | 2.8 Percentage change | -184.8% |
| 1980 | 7.6 Percentage change | +171.4% |
| 1981 | 2.8 Percentage change | -63.2% |
| 1982 | -0.5 Percentage change | -117.9% |
| 1983 | 5.2 Percentage change | -1140.0% |
| 1984 | -6.6 Percentage change | -226.9% |
| 1985 | 1.7 Percentage change | -125.8% |
| 1986 | 2.7 Percentage change | +58.8% |
| 1987 | -1 Percentage change | -137.0% |
| 1988 | 7.7 Percentage change | -870.0% |
| 1989 | -9.8 Percentage change | -227.3% |
| 1990 | -8.1 Percentage change | -17.3% |
| 1991 | -1.7 Percentage change | -79.0% |
| 1992 | 4.3 Percentage change | -352.9% |
| 1993 | -2.4 Percentage change | -155.8% |
| 1994 | 2.2 Percentage change | -191.7% |
| 1995 | -11.9 Percentage change | -640.9% |
| 1996 | -3.7 Percentage change | -68.9% |
| 1997 | -2.8 Percentage change | -24.3% |
| 1998 | 5 Percentage change | -278.6% |
| 1999 | 1.7 Percentage change | -66.0% |
| 2000 | 4.2 Percentage change | +147.1% |
| 2001 | -1.2 Percentage change | -128.6% |
| 2002 | 1 Percentage change | -183.3% |
| 2003 | -3.3 Percentage change | -430.0% |
| 2004 | 3.3 Percentage change | -200.0% |
| 2005 | 3.1 Percentage change | -6.1% |
| 2006 | 1.9 Percentage change | -38.7% |
| 2007 | 5.2 Percentage change | +173.7% |
| 2008 | 5.7 Percentage change | +9.6% |
| 2009 | -3.7 Percentage change | -164.9% |
| 2010 | -0.8 Percentage change | -78.4% |
| 2011 | -8.5 Percentage change | +962.5% |
| 2012 | 4.6 Percentage change | -154.1% |
| 2013 | -3.1 Percentage change | -167.4% |
| 2014 | 2 Percentage change | -164.5% |
| 2015 | 0 Percentage change | -100.0% |
| 2016 | -1.4 Percentage change | — |
| 2017 | 5.2 Percentage change | -471.4% |
| 2018 | -3.5 Percentage change | -167.3% |
| 2019 | -1.3 Percentage change | -62.9% |
| 2020 | -3.2 Percentage change | +146.2% |
| 2021 | 5.1 Percentage change | -259.4% |
| 2022 | -1.5 Percentage change | -129.4% |
| 2023 | 2.6 Percentage change | -273.3% |
| 2024 | 1 Percentage change | -61.5% |
| 2025 | -5.2 Percentage change | -620.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -3.95 Percentage change | -15.9 Percentage change | 4.6 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1960s | -3.25 Percentage change | -16.4 Percentage change | 2.8 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.35 Percentage change | -9.4 Percentage change | 3 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.98 Percentage change | -9.8 Percentage change | 7.7 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.74 Percentage change | -11.9 Percentage change | 5 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.62 Percentage change | -3.7 Percentage change | 5.7 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.68 Percentage change | -8.5 Percentage change | 5.2 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2 Percentage change | -5.2 Percentage change | 5.1 Percentage change | 6 |
More environment data for Bath and North East Somerset
- Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste 0.01 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Daytime summer land 23.21 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Daytime winter land 4.1 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Daytime yearly land 14.84 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Nighttime summer land 10.05 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Nighttime winter land 1.13 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Land surface temperature - Cities and FUAs — Nighttime yearly land 5.4 Degrees celsius (2024)
- Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to nitrogen 37.42 Microgrammes per cubic metre (2025)
- Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to ozone 94.06 Microgrammes per cubic metre (2025)
- Air pollution - Cities and FUAs — Population exposure to PM10 32.86 Microgrammes per cubic metre (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset?
- Drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Bath and North East Somerset was -5.2 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Bath and North East Somerset?
- The highest recorded value was 7.7 Percentage change in 1988.
- What is the lowest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Bath and North East Somerset?
- The lowest recorded value was -16.4 Percentage change in 1961.
- How does Bath and North East Somerset rank for drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly?
- Bath and North East Somerset ranks 874th out of 1315 regions with data for 2025.
- Where does this Bath and North East Somerset data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides regional statistics on estimate of soil moisture anomaly, in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and Cities. Data sources and methodology Drought is defined by the soil moisture change compared to the reference period 1981-2010. The soil moisture refers to the volume of water in the first soil layer (0 to 7 cm). This indicator is based on Copernicus ERA5-Land. ERA5-Land is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (0.1 degree), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators also where national meteorological data are not available at the required scale. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Drought - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org