Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater)

Los Angeles (Greater): Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly was -20.1 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
-20.1 Percentage change
Change on year
down 556.8%
Rank
1296th
of 1315 regions
All-time high
52.3 Percentage change
in 1993
All-time low
-33.4 Percentage change
in 1950
Years of data
76
1950–2025

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater), 1950–2025

-40-200204060195019872025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.

Analysis

Los Angeles (Greater) recorded -20.1 Percentage change for drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in 2025.

That represents a change of down 556.8% on the previous year and down 8.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater) peaked at 52.3 Percentage change in 1993 and was at its lowest, -33.4 Percentage change, in 1950.

That places Los Angeles (Greater) 1296th out of 1315 regions with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater), year by year

Annual values for Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater), 1950 to 2025.
Year Percentage change Change
1950 -33.4 Percentage change
1951 -20.2 Percentage change -39.5%
1952 23.6 Percentage change -216.8%
1953 -19.8 Percentage change -183.9%
1954 -17.3 Percentage change -12.6%
1955 -14.7 Percentage change -15.0%
1956 -26 Percentage change +76.9%
1957 0 Percentage change -100.0%
1958 -8.1 Percentage change
1959 -32.3 Percentage change +298.8%
1960 12.2 Percentage change -137.8%
1961 -21.6 Percentage change -277.0%
1962 -2.5 Percentage change -88.4%
1963 -27.7 Percentage change +1008.0%
1964 -31.3 Percentage change +13.0%
1965 -11.7 Percentage change -62.6%
1966 14.8 Percentage change -226.5%
1967 10.8 Percentage change -27.0%
1968 -22.1 Percentage change -304.6%
1969 15.6 Percentage change -170.6%
1970 -10.2 Percentage change -165.4%
1971 -15.9 Percentage change +55.9%
1972 -11.3 Percentage change -28.9%
1973 -4.9 Percentage change -56.6%
1974 -24.4 Percentage change +398.0%
1975 -22.2 Percentage change -9.0%
1976 -33 Percentage change +48.6%
1977 -20.9 Percentage change -36.7%
1978 50.8 Percentage change -343.1%
1979 19 Percentage change -62.6%
1980 11.3 Percentage change -40.5%
1981 -5.9 Percentage change -152.2%
1982 8 Percentage change -235.6%
1983 47.9 Percentage change +498.8%
1984 -7.3 Percentage change -115.2%
1985 16.4 Percentage change -324.7%
1986 -11 Percentage change -167.1%
1987 -1.4 Percentage change -87.3%
1988 -2.3 Percentage change +64.3%
1989 -30.1 Percentage change +1208.7%
1990 -26.7 Percentage change -11.3%
1991 11.2 Percentage change -141.9%
1992 22.2 Percentage change +98.2%
1993 52.3 Percentage change +135.6%
1994 -27.6 Percentage change -152.8%
1995 15.1 Percentage change -154.7%
1996 5.7 Percentage change -62.3%
1997 -8.5 Percentage change -249.1%
1998 18.6 Percentage change -318.8%
1999 -31.6 Percentage change -269.9%
2000 -21.4 Percentage change -32.3%
2001 5.5 Percentage change -125.7%
2002 -28.6 Percentage change -620.0%
2003 -8 Percentage change -72.0%
2004 16.2 Percentage change -302.5%
2005 48 Percentage change +196.3%
2006 -16.5 Percentage change -134.4%
2007 -23 Percentage change +39.4%
2008 -6.8 Percentage change -70.4%
2009 -17.6 Percentage change +158.8%
2010 7.2 Percentage change -140.9%
2011 20.1 Percentage change +179.2%
2012 -30.6 Percentage change -252.2%
2013 -5.9 Percentage change -80.7%
2014 -24.6 Percentage change +316.9%
2015 -18.5 Percentage change -24.8%
2016 -17.6 Percentage change -4.9%
2017 20.1 Percentage change -214.2%
2018 -32.3 Percentage change -260.7%
2019 11.4 Percentage change -135.3%
2020 -12.2 Percentage change -207.0%
2021 -27 Percentage change +121.3%
2022 -16.1 Percentage change -40.4%
2023 11.6 Percentage change -172.0%
2024 4.4 Percentage change -62.1%
2025 -20.1 Percentage change -556.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1950s -14.82 Percentage change -33.4 Percentage change 23.6 Percentage change 10
1960s -6.35 Percentage change -31.3 Percentage change 15.6 Percentage change 10
1970s -7.3 Percentage change -33 Percentage change 50.8 Percentage change 10
1980s 2.56 Percentage change -30.1 Percentage change 47.9 Percentage change 10
1990s 3.07 Percentage change -31.6 Percentage change 52.3 Percentage change 10
2000s -5.22 Percentage change -28.6 Percentage change 48 Percentage change 10
2010s -7.07 Percentage change -32.3 Percentage change 20.1 Percentage change 10
2020s -9.9 Percentage change -27 Percentage change 11.6 Percentage change 6

More environment data for Los Angeles (Greater)

All data for Los Angeles (Greater) →

Frequently asked questions

What is drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater)?
Drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater) was -20.1 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Los Angeles (Greater)?
The highest recorded value was 52.3 Percentage change in 1993.
What is the lowest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Los Angeles (Greater)?
The lowest recorded value was -33.4 Percentage change in 1950.
How does Los Angeles (Greater) rank for drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly?
Los Angeles (Greater) ranks 1296th out of 1315 regions with data for 2025.
Is drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly rising or falling in Los Angeles (Greater)?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Los Angeles (Greater) data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater). Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/drought-cities-and-fuas-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/los-angeles-greater/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/drought-cities-and-fuas-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/los-angeles-greater/">Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Los Angeles (Greater)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,325 places, 100,700 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides regional statistics on estimate of soil moisture anomaly, in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and Cities. Data sources and methodology Drought is defined by the soil moisture change compared to the reference period 1981-2010. The soil moisture refers to the volume of water in the first soil layer (0 to 7 cm). This indicator is based on Copernicus ERA5-Land. ERA5-Land is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (0.1 degree), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators also where national meteorological data are not available at the required scale. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Drought - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org