Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach

Volusia-Daytona Beach: Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly was -1.9 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
-1.9 Percentage change
Change on year
up 53.7%
Rank
553rd
of 1315 regions
All-time high
22.4 Percentage change
in 1983
All-time low
-26.7 Percentage change
in 1950
Years of data
76
1950–2025

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach, 1950–2025

-30-20-1001020195019872025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.

Analysis

In 2025, drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach stood at -1.9 Percentage change.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 53.7% on the previous year and down 140.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach peaked at 22.4 Percentage change in 1983 and was at its lowest, -26.7 Percentage change, in 1950.

That places Volusia-Daytona Beach 553rd out of 1315 regions with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach, year by year

Annual values for Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach, 1950 to 2025.
Year Percentage change Change
1950 -26.7 Percentage change
1951 -7.9 Percentage change -70.4%
1952 -4.8 Percentage change -39.2%
1953 -4.6 Percentage change -4.2%
1954 -2.2 Percentage change -52.2%
1955 -13.8 Percentage change +527.3%
1956 -19.1 Percentage change +38.4%
1957 4.4 Percentage change -123.0%
1958 2.7 Percentage change -38.6%
1959 20.4 Percentage change +655.6%
1960 11.7 Percentage change -42.6%
1961 -14.7 Percentage change -225.6%
1962 -0.7 Percentage change -95.2%
1963 -2 Percentage change +185.7%
1964 7.8 Percentage change -490.0%
1965 3.6 Percentage change -53.8%
1966 6.1 Percentage change +69.4%
1967 -23.7 Percentage change -488.5%
1968 -13.7 Percentage change -42.2%
1969 2 Percentage change -114.6%
1970 -9.2 Percentage change -560.0%
1971 -5.5 Percentage change -40.2%
1972 3.6 Percentage change -165.5%
1973 5.1 Percentage change +41.7%
1974 -15.8 Percentage change -409.8%
1975 -10.3 Percentage change -34.8%
1976 -8.4 Percentage change -18.4%
1977 -1.3 Percentage change -84.5%
1978 -9 Percentage change +592.3%
1979 3 Percentage change -133.3%
1980 -1 Percentage change -133.3%
1981 -22.1 Percentage change +2110.0%
1982 16.9 Percentage change -176.5%
1983 22.4 Percentage change +32.5%
1984 5.9 Percentage change -73.7%
1985 -8.1 Percentage change -237.3%
1986 0.9 Percentage change -111.1%
1987 10.6 Percentage change +1077.8%
1988 2.3 Percentage change -78.3%
1989 -0.7 Percentage change -130.4%
1990 -6.7 Percentage change +857.1%
1991 6.8 Percentage change -201.5%
1992 1.2 Percentage change -82.4%
1993 10.8 Percentage change +800.0%
1994 14.5 Percentage change +34.3%
1995 6 Percentage change -58.6%
1996 -1.9 Percentage change -131.7%
1997 11.7 Percentage change -715.8%
1998 -6.4 Percentage change -154.7%
1999 -2 Percentage change -68.8%
2000 -9.6 Percentage change +380.0%
2001 -1 Percentage change -89.6%
2002 1.9 Percentage change -290.0%
2003 4.7 Percentage change +147.4%
2004 -9.3 Percentage change -297.9%
2005 8.3 Percentage change -189.2%
2006 -20.3 Percentage change -344.6%
2007 -13.1 Percentage change -35.5%
2008 -7.9 Percentage change -39.7%
2009 -9.6 Percentage change +21.5%
2010 -6.3 Percentage change -34.4%
2011 -6.5 Percentage change +3.2%
2012 -11.3 Percentage change +73.8%
2013 -12.8 Percentage change +13.3%
2014 21.1 Percentage change -264.8%
2015 4.7 Percentage change -77.7%
2016 -5.9 Percentage change -225.5%
2017 -4.5 Percentage change -23.7%
2018 10.5 Percentage change -333.3%
2019 -1.3 Percentage change -112.4%
2020 9 Percentage change -792.3%
2021 -8.2 Percentage change -191.1%
2022 7.2 Percentage change -187.8%
2023 -6.7 Percentage change -193.1%
2024 -4.1 Percentage change -38.8%
2025 -1.9 Percentage change -53.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1950s -5.16 Percentage change -26.7 Percentage change 20.4 Percentage change 10
1960s -2.36 Percentage change -23.7 Percentage change 11.7 Percentage change 10
1970s -4.78 Percentage change -15.8 Percentage change 5.1 Percentage change 10
1980s 2.71 Percentage change -22.1 Percentage change 22.4 Percentage change 10
1990s 3.4 Percentage change -6.7 Percentage change 14.5 Percentage change 10
2000s -5.59 Percentage change -20.3 Percentage change 8.3 Percentage change 10
2010s -1.23 Percentage change -12.8 Percentage change 21.1 Percentage change 10
2020s -0.7833 Percentage change -8.2 Percentage change 9 Percentage change 6

More environment data for Volusia-Daytona Beach

All data for Volusia-Daytona Beach →

Frequently asked questions

What is drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach?
Drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach was -1.9 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Volusia-Daytona Beach?
The highest recorded value was 22.4 Percentage change in 1983.
What is the lowest drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly recorded in Volusia-Daytona Beach?
The lowest recorded value was -26.7 Percentage change in 1950.
How does Volusia-Daytona Beach rank for drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly?
Volusia-Daytona Beach ranks 553rd out of 1315 regions with data for 2025.
Is drought - cities and fuas — land soil moisture anomaly rising or falling in Volusia-Daytona Beach?
Over the last ten years it is down 140.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Volusia-Daytona Beach data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/drought-cities-and-fuas-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/volusia-daytona-beach/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/drought-cities-and-fuas-land-soil-moisture-anomaly/volusia-daytona-beach/">Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly in Volusia-Daytona Beach</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Drought - Cities and FUAs — Land soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,325 places, 100,700 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset provides regional statistics on estimate of soil moisture anomaly, in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and Cities. Data sources and methodology Drought is defined by the soil moisture change compared to the reference period 1981-2010. The soil moisture refers to the volume of water in the first soil layer (0 to 7 cm). This indicator is based on Copernicus ERA5-Land. ERA5-Land is used as it provides harmonised, globally consistent coverage at fine spatial resolution (0.1 degree), enabling the production of comparable subnational indicators also where national meteorological data are not available at the required scale. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. These estimates may differ from official subnational climate statistics due to differences in methodological approaches, such as the use of reanalysis based top down modelling versus in situ observations, along with variations in input data sources, spatial resolution, and the models and algorithms used to generate temperature estimates. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The correspondence table between SAUs and FUAs/cities is available in parquet and csv format. The definition identifies 1 272 FUAs and 1 269 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Drought - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org