Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba
Cuba: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly was -5.17 Percentage change in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba, 1950–2025
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage change.
Analysis
The most recent figure for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba is -5.17 Percentage change, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 288.3% on the previous year and up 46.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba peaked at 17.47 Percentage change in 1960 and was at its lowest, -14.72 Percentage change, in 2004.
Cuba ranks 106th of 168 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Percentage change | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1950 | -4.3 Percentage change | — |
| 1951 | -0.2265 Percentage change | -94.7% |
| 1952 | 1.85 Percentage change | -917.5% |
| 1953 | 2.93 Percentage change | +58.2% |
| 1954 | 6.46 Percentage change | +120.6% |
| 1955 | -4.22 Percentage change | -165.4% |
| 1956 | -9.33 Percentage change | +120.9% |
| 1957 | -1.33 Percentage change | -85.7% |
| 1958 | -8.83 Percentage change | +563.7% |
| 1959 | -12.47 Percentage change | +41.1% |
| 1960 | 17.47 Percentage change | -240.1% |
| 1961 | -2.32 Percentage change | -113.3% |
| 1962 | -1.87 Percentage change | -19.3% |
| 1963 | 0.5623 Percentage change | -130.0% |
| 1964 | 16.15 Percentage change | +2772.5% |
| 1965 | -4.32 Percentage change | -126.7% |
| 1966 | 8.31 Percentage change | -292.5% |
| 1967 | -5.61 Percentage change | -167.5% |
| 1968 | 2.44 Percentage change | -143.4% |
| 1969 | 12.62 Percentage change | +418.0% |
| 1970 | -2.42 Percentage change | -119.1% |
| 1971 | -3.55 Percentage change | +46.9% |
| 1972 | 3.78 Percentage change | -206.6% |
| 1973 | 5.47 Percentage change | +44.5% |
| 1974 | -3.14 Percentage change | -157.4% |
| 1975 | -3.61 Percentage change | +15.2% |
| 1976 | 0.3406 Percentage change | -109.4% |
| 1977 | 6.47 Percentage change | +1799.0% |
| 1978 | 12.17 Percentage change | +88.1% |
| 1979 | 11.36 Percentage change | -6.6% |
| 1980 | 0.6274 Percentage change | -94.5% |
| 1981 | 2.61 Percentage change | +315.9% |
| 1982 | 2.05 Percentage change | -21.5% |
| 1983 | 14.62 Percentage change | +613.5% |
| 1984 | 2.82 Percentage change | -80.7% |
| 1985 | 1.66 Percentage change | -41.0% |
| 1986 | -0.1312 Percentage change | -107.9% |
| 1987 | 0.2471 Percentage change | -288.4% |
| 1988 | 8.97 Percentage change | +3527.9% |
| 1989 | -3.42 Percentage change | -138.1% |
| 1990 | 2.26 Percentage change | -166.0% |
| 1991 | 1.03 Percentage change | -54.3% |
| 1992 | -2.93 Percentage change | -383.9% |
| 1993 | 4.02 Percentage change | -237.1% |
| 1994 | 7.42 Percentage change | +84.5% |
| 1995 | 2.58 Percentage change | -65.2% |
| 1996 | -2.12 Percentage change | -182.4% |
| 1997 | -8.51 Percentage change | +300.6% |
| 1998 | -4.08 Percentage change | -52.1% |
| 1999 | 1.98 Percentage change | -148.6% |
| 2000 | -9.93 Percentage change | -600.6% |
| 2001 | 1.79 Percentage change | -118.0% |
| 2002 | -1.33 Percentage change | -174.6% |
| 2003 | -1.84 Percentage change | +37.5% |
| 2004 | -14.72 Percentage change | +701.8% |
| 2005 | -1.27 Percentage change | -91.4% |
| 2006 | 0.2306 Percentage change | -118.1% |
| 2007 | 7.23 Percentage change | +3034.1% |
| 2008 | -2.29 Percentage change | -131.7% |
| 2009 | -10.1 Percentage change | +340.5% |
| 2010 | 1.17 Percentage change | -111.6% |
| 2011 | -2.31 Percentage change | -296.5% |
| 2012 | 0.2164 Percentage change | -109.4% |
| 2013 | 3.17 Percentage change | +1363.1% |
| 2014 | -1.76 Percentage change | -155.7% |
| 2015 | -9.7 Percentage change | +450.1% |
| 2016 | -1.27 Percentage change | -87.0% |
| 2017 | -0.0622 Percentage change | -95.1% |
| 2018 | 1.58 Percentage change | -2633.3% |
| 2019 | -3.41 Percentage change | -316.3% |
| 2020 | -2.77 Percentage change | -18.7% |
| 2021 | -6.24 Percentage change | +125.3% |
| 2022 | -5.21 Percentage change | -16.5% |
| 2023 | -5.97 Percentage change | +14.6% |
| 2024 | 2.75 Percentage change | -146.0% |
| 2025 | -5.17 Percentage change | -288.3% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -5.17 Percentage change is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -3.12 Percentage change, 1.7× the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -5.17 Percentage change is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -2.99 Percentage change, 1.7× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | +3527.9% | 0.2471 Percentage change | 8.97 Percentage change |
| 2007 | +3034.1% | 0.2306 Percentage change | 7.23 Percentage change |
| 1964 | +2772.5% | 0.5623 Percentage change | 16.15 Percentage change |
| 2018 | +2633.3% | -0.0622 Percentage change | 1.58 Percentage change |
| 1977 | +1799.0% | 0.3406 Percentage change | 6.47 Percentage change |
| 2013 | +1363.1% | 0.2164 Percentage change | 3.17 Percentage change |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -2.95 Percentage change | -12.47 Percentage change | 6.46 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1960s | 4.34 Percentage change | -5.61 Percentage change | 17.47 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.69 Percentage change | -3.61 Percentage change | 12.17 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1980s | 3 Percentage change | -3.42 Percentage change | 14.62 Percentage change | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1645 Percentage change | -8.51 Percentage change | 7.42 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.22 Percentage change | -14.72 Percentage change | 7.23 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.24 Percentage change | -9.7 Percentage change | 3.17 Percentage change | 10 |
| 2020s | -3.77 Percentage change | -6.24 Percentage change | 2.75 Percentage change | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More environment data for Cuba
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -5.3 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.278 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.4 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 2.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba?
- Historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly in Cuba was -5.17 Percentage change in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 17.47 Percentage change in 1960.
- What is the lowest historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -14.72 Percentage change in 2004.
- How does Cuba rank for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Cuba ranks 106th out of 168 countries with data for 2025.
- Is historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 46.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org