Statizoid

Major livestock types — Share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago

Trinidad and Tobago: Major livestock types — Share in total livestock was 100 %LSU in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
100 %LSU
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 195 countries
All-time high
100 %LSU
in 1961
All-time low
100 %LSU
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Major livestock types — Share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago, 1961–2023

020406080100196119922023

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %LSU.

Analysis

In 2023, major livestock types — share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago stood at 100 %LSU. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, major livestock types — share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 100 %LSU in 1961 and was at its lowest, 100 %LSU, in 1961.

That places Trinidad and Tobago 1st out of 195 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

Major livestock types — Share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year

Year %LSU Change
1961 100 %LSU —
1962 100 %LSU +0.0%
1963 100 %LSU +0.0%
1964 100 %LSU +0.0%
1965 100 %LSU +0.0%
1966 100 %LSU +0.0%
1967 100 %LSU +0.0%
1968 100 %LSU +0.0%
1969 100 %LSU +0.0%
1970 100 %LSU +0.0%
1971 100 %LSU +0.0%
1972 100 %LSU +0.0%
1973 100 %LSU +0.0%
1974 100 %LSU +0.0%
1975 100 %LSU +0.0%
1976 100 %LSU +0.0%
1977 100 %LSU +0.0%
1978 100 %LSU +0.0%
1979 100 %LSU +0.0%
1980 100 %LSU +0.0%
1981 100 %LSU +0.0%
1982 100 %LSU +0.0%
1983 100 %LSU +0.0%
1984 100 %LSU +0.0%
1985 100 %LSU +0.0%
1986 100 %LSU +0.0%
1987 100 %LSU +0.0%
1988 100 %LSU +0.0%
1989 100 %LSU +0.0%
1990 100 %LSU +0.0%
1991 100 %LSU +0.0%
1992 100 %LSU +0.0%
1993 100 %LSU +0.0%
1994 100 %LSU +0.0%
1995 100 %LSU +0.0%
1996 100 %LSU +0.0%
1997 100 %LSU +0.0%
1998 100 %LSU +0.0%
1999 100 %LSU +0.0%
2000 100 %LSU +0.0%
2001 100 %LSU +0.0%
2002 100 %LSU +0.0%
2003 100 %LSU +0.0%
2004 100 %LSU +0.0%
2005 100 %LSU +0.0%
2006 100 %LSU +0.0%
2007 100 %LSU +0.0%
2008 100 %LSU +0.0%
2009 100 %LSU +0.0%
2010 100 %LSU +0.0%
2011 100 %LSU +0.0%
2012 100 %LSU +0.0%
2013 100 %LSU +0.0%
2014 100 %LSU +0.0%
2015 100 %LSU +0.0%
2016 100 %LSU +0.0%
2017 100 %LSU +0.0%
2018 100 %LSU +0.0%
2019 100 %LSU +0.0%
2020 100 %LSU +0.0%
2021 100 %LSU +0.0%
2022 100 %LSU +0.0%
2023 100 %LSU +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 9
1970s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 10
1980s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 10
1990s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 10
2000s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 10
2010s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 10
2020s 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 100 %LSU 4

Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100 %LSU compare
  2. 1 Albania 100 %LSU compare
  3. 1 Algeria 100 %LSU compare
  4. 1 Angola 100 %LSU compare
  5. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100 %LSU compare
  6. 1 Argentina 100 %LSU compare
  7. 1 Armenia 100 %LSU compare
  8. 1 Australia 100 %LSU compare
  9. 1 Austria 100 %LSU compare
  10. 1 Azerbaijan 100 %LSU compare
  11. 1 Bahamas 100 %LSU compare
  12. 1 Bahrain 100 %LSU compare
  13. 1 Bangladesh 100 %LSU compare
  14. 1 Barbados 100 %LSU compare
  15. 1 Belarus 100 %LSU compare
  16. 1 Belgium 100 %LSU compare
  17. 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 100 %LSU compare
  18. 1 Belize 100 %LSU compare
  19. 1 Benin 100 %LSU compare
  20. 1 Bhutan 100 %LSU compare
  21. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100 %LSU compare
  22. 1 Botswana 100 %LSU compare
  23. 1 Brazil 100 %LSU compare
  24. 1 Brunei Darussalam 100 %LSU compare
  25. 1 Bulgaria 100 %LSU compare
  26. 1 Burkina Faso 100 %LSU compare
  27. 1 Burundi 100 %LSU compare
  28. 1 Cabo Verde 100 %LSU compare
  29. 1 Cambodia 100 %LSU compare
  30. 1 Cameroon 100 %LSU compare
  31. 1 Canada 100 %LSU compare
  32. 1 Central African Republic 100 %LSU compare
  33. 1 Chad 100 %LSU compare
  34. 1 Chile 100 %LSU compare
  35. 1 China 100 %LSU compare
  36. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 %LSU compare
  37. 1 China, Macao SAR 100 %LSU compare
  38. 1 China, mainland 100 %LSU compare
  39. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 %LSU compare
  40. 1 Colombia 100 %LSU compare
  41. 1 Comoros 100 %LSU compare
  42. 1 Congo 100 %LSU compare
  43. 1 Cook Islands 100 %LSU compare
  44. 1 Costa Rica 100 %LSU compare
  45. 1 Croatia 100 %LSU compare
  46. 1 Cuba 100 %LSU compare
  47. 1 Cyprus 100 %LSU compare
  48. 1 Czechia 100 %LSU compare
  49. 1 Czechoslovakia 100 %LSU compare
  50. 1 Democratic Republic of the Congo 100 %LSU compare
  51. 1 Denmark 100 %LSU compare
  52. 1 Djibouti 100 %LSU compare
  53. 1 Dominica 100 %LSU compare
  54. 1 Dominican Republic 100 %LSU compare
  55. 1 Ecuador 100 %LSU compare
  56. 1 Egypt 100 %LSU compare
  57. 1 El Salvador 100 %LSU compare
  58. 1 Equatorial Guinea 100 %LSU compare
  59. 1 Eritrea 100 %LSU compare
  60. 1 Estonia 100 %LSU compare
  61. 1 Eswatini 100 %LSU compare
  62. 1 Ethiopia 100 %LSU compare
  63. 1 Ethiopia PDR 100 %LSU compare
  64. 1 Faroe Islands 100 %LSU compare
  65. 1 Fiji 100 %LSU compare
  66. 1 Finland 100 %LSU compare
  67. 1 France 100 %LSU compare
  68. 1 French Guiana 100 %LSU compare
  69. 1 French Polynesia 100 %LSU compare
  70. 1 Gabon 100 %LSU compare
  71. 1 Gambia 100 %LSU compare
  72. 1 Georgia 100 %LSU compare
  73. 1 Germany 100 %LSU compare
  74. 1 Ghana 100 %LSU compare
  75. 1 Greece 100 %LSU compare
  76. 1 Grenada 100 %LSU compare
  77. 1 Guadeloupe 100 %LSU compare
  78. 1 Guatemala 100 %LSU compare
  79. 1 Guinea 100 %LSU compare
  80. 1 Guinea-Bissau 100 %LSU compare
  81. 1 Guyana 100 %LSU compare
  82. 1 Haiti 100 %LSU compare
  83. 1 Honduras 100 %LSU compare
  84. 1 Hungary 100 %LSU compare
  85. 1 Iceland 100 %LSU compare
  86. 1 India 100 %LSU compare
  87. 1 Indonesia 100 %LSU compare
  88. 1 Iraq 100 %LSU compare
  89. 1 Ireland 100 %LSU compare
  90. 1 Israel 100 %LSU compare
  91. 1 Italy 100 %LSU compare
  92. 1 Jamaica 100 %LSU compare
  93. 1 Japan 100 %LSU compare
  94. 1 Jordan 100 %LSU compare
  95. 1 Kazakhstan 100 %LSU compare
  96. 1 Kenya 100 %LSU compare
  97. 1 Kiribati 100 %LSU compare
  98. 1 Kuwait 100 %LSU compare
  99. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 %LSU compare
  100. 1 Latvia 100 %LSU compare
  101. 1 Lebanon 100 %LSU compare
  102. 1 Lesotho 100 %LSU compare
  103. 1 Liberia 100 %LSU compare
  104. 1 Libya 100 %LSU compare
  105. 1 Lithuania 100 %LSU compare
  106. 1 Luxembourg 100 %LSU compare
  107. 1 Madagascar 100 %LSU compare
  108. 1 Malawi 100 %LSU compare
  109. 1 Malaysia 100 %LSU compare
  110. 1 Mali 100 %LSU compare
  111. 1 Malta 100 %LSU compare
  112. 1 Martinique 100 %LSU compare
  113. 1 Mauritania 100 %LSU compare
  114. 1 Mauritius 100 %LSU compare
  115. 1 Mexico 100 %LSU compare
  116. 1 Mongolia 100 %LSU compare
  117. 1 Montenegro 100 %LSU compare
  118. 1 Morocco 100 %LSU compare
  119. 1 Mozambique 100 %LSU compare
  120. 1 Myanmar 100 %LSU compare
  121. 1 Namibia 100 %LSU compare
  122. 1 Naoero 100 %LSU compare
  123. 1 Nepal 100 %LSU compare
  124. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 %LSU compare
  125. 1 New Caledonia 100 %LSU compare
  126. 1 New Zealand 100 %LSU compare
  127. 1 Nicaragua 100 %LSU compare
  128. 1 Niger 100 %LSU compare
  129. 1 Nigeria 100 %LSU compare
  130. 1 Niue 100 %LSU compare
  131. 1 North Macedonia 100 %LSU compare
  132. 1 Norway 100 %LSU compare
  133. 1 Oman 100 %LSU compare
  134. 1 Pakistan 100 %LSU compare
  135. 1 Palestine, State of 100 %LSU compare
  136. 1 Panama 100 %LSU compare
  137. 1 Papua New Guinea 100 %LSU compare
  138. 1 Paraguay 100 %LSU compare
  139. 1 Peru 100 %LSU compare
  140. 1 Philippines 100 %LSU compare
  141. 1 Poland 100 %LSU compare
  142. 1 Portugal 100 %LSU compare
  143. 1 Puerto Rico 100 %LSU compare
  144. 1 Qatar 100 %LSU compare
  145. 1 Republic of Korea 100 %LSU compare
  146. 1 Réunion 100 %LSU compare
  147. 1 Romania 100 %LSU compare
  148. 1 Russian Federation 100 %LSU compare
  149. 1 Rwanda 100 %LSU compare
  150. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 %LSU compare
  151. 1 Saint Lucia 100 %LSU compare
  152. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 %LSU compare
  153. 1 Samoa 100 %LSU compare
  154. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100 %LSU compare
  155. 1 Saudi Arabia 100 %LSU compare
  156. 1 Senegal 100 %LSU compare
  157. 1 Serbia 100 %LSU compare
  158. 1 Serbia and Montenegro 100 %LSU compare
  159. 1 Seychelles 100 %LSU compare
  160. 1 Sierra Leone 100 %LSU compare
  161. 1 Singapore 100 %LSU compare
  162. 1 Slovakia 100 %LSU compare
  163. 1 Slovenia 100 %LSU compare
  164. 1 Solomon Islands 100 %LSU compare
  165. 1 Somalia 100 %LSU compare
  166. 1 South Africa 100 %LSU compare
  167. 1 South Sudan 100 %LSU compare
  168. 1 Spain 100 %LSU compare
  169. 1 Sri Lanka 100 %LSU compare
  170. 1 Sudan 100 %LSU compare
  171. 1 Sudan (former) 100 %LSU compare
  172. 1 Suriname 100 %LSU compare
  173. 1 Sweden 100 %LSU compare
  174. 1 Switzerland 100 %LSU compare
  175. 1 Tajikistan 100 %LSU compare
  176. 1 Thailand 100 %LSU compare
  177. 1 Timor-Leste 100 %LSU compare
  178. 1 Togo 100 %LSU compare
  179. 1 Tokelau 100 %LSU compare
  180. 1 Tonga 100 %LSU compare
  181. 1 Tunisia 100 %LSU compare
  182. 1 Türkiye 100 %LSU compare
  183. 1 Turkmenistan 100 %LSU compare
  184. 1 Tuvalu 100 %LSU compare
  185. 1 Uganda 100 %LSU compare
  186. 1 Ukraine 100 %LSU compare
  187. 1 United Arab Emirates 100 %LSU compare
  188. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 %LSU compare
  189. 1 Uruguay 100 %LSU compare
  190. 1 USSR 100 %LSU compare
  191. 1 Uzbekistan 100 %LSU compare
  192. 1 Vanuatu 100 %LSU compare
  193. 1 Viet Nam 100 %LSU compare
  194. 1 Yemen 100 %LSU compare
  195. 1 Yugoslav SFR 100 %LSU compare
  196. 1 Zambia 100 %LSU compare
  197. 1 Zimbabwe 100 %LSU compare
  198. 1 Australia and New Zealand 100 %LSU compare
  199. 1 OECD 100 %LSU compare

See the full ranking of 246 places →

More environment data for Trinidad and Tobago

All data for Trinidad and Tobago →

Frequently asked questions

What is major livestock types — share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago?
Major livestock types — share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago was 100 %LSU in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest major livestock types — share in total livestock recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The highest recorded value was 100 %LSU in 1961.
What is the lowest major livestock types — share in total livestock recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The lowest recorded value was 100 %LSU in 1961.
How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for major livestock types — share in total livestock?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
Is major livestock types — share in total livestock rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Major livestock types — Share in total livestock. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Major livestock types — Share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/major-livestock-types-share-in-total-livestock/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/major-livestock-types-share-in-total-livestock/trinidad-and-tobago/">Major livestock types — Share in total livestock in Trinidad and Tobago</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Major livestock types — Share in total livestock
Unit
%LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,138 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.