Statizoid

Mangroves — Area from CCI_LC in Tokelau

Tokelau: Mangroves — Area from CCI_LC was 0 1000 ha in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
0 1000 ha
World rank
118th
of 241 countries
All-time high
0 1000 ha
in 1992
All-time low
0 1000 ha
in 1992
Years of data
31
1992–2022

Mangroves — Area from CCI_LC in Tokelau, 1992–2022

00.20.40.60.811992200720221992: 0 1000 ha1993: 0 1000 ha1994: 0 1000 ha1995: 0 1000 ha1996: 0 1000 ha1997: 0 1000 ha1998: 0 1000 ha1999: 0 1000 ha2000: 0 1000 ha2001: 0 1000 ha2002: 0 1000 ha2003: 0 1000 ha2004: 0 1000 ha2005: 0 1000 ha2006: 0 1000 ha2007: 0 1000 ha2008: 0 1000 ha2009: 0 1000 ha2010: 0 1000 ha2011: 0 1000 ha2012: 0 1000 ha2013: 0 1000 ha2014: 0 1000 ha2015: 0 1000 ha2016: 0 1000 ha2017: 0 1000 ha2018: 0 1000 ha2019: 0 1000 ha2020: 0 1000 ha2021: 0 1000 ha2022: 0 1000 ha

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 ha.

Analysis

Tokelau recorded 0 1000 ha for mangroves — area from cci_lc in 2022. That is the highest value across all 31 years on record.

Over the whole period, mangroves — area from cci_lc in Tokelau peaked at 0 1000 ha in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha, in 1992.

That places Tokelau 118th out of 241 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 8
2000s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 10
2010s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 10
2020s 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 0 1000 ha 3

Countries ranked near Tokelau

  1. 116 Aruba 0.01 1000 ha compare
  2. 116 China, Macao SAR 0.01 1000 ha compare
  3. 118 Afghanistan 0 1000 ha compare
  4. 118 Albania 0 1000 ha compare
  5. 118 Algeria 0 1000 ha compare
  6. 118 Andorra 0 1000 ha compare
  7. 118 Antarctica 0 1000 ha compare
  8. 118 Argentina 0 1000 ha compare
  9. 118 Armenia 0 1000 ha compare
  10. 118 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 1000 ha compare
  11. 118 Austria 0 1000 ha compare
  12. 118 Azerbaijan 0 1000 ha compare
  13. 118 Barbados 0 1000 ha compare
  14. 118 Belarus 0 1000 ha compare
  15. 118 Belgium 0 1000 ha compare
  16. 118 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 1000 ha compare
  17. 118 Bermuda 0 1000 ha compare
  18. 118 Bhutan 0 1000 ha compare
  19. 118 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 ha compare
  20. 118 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 ha compare
  21. 118 Botswana 0 1000 ha compare
  22. 118 Bulgaria 0 1000 ha compare
  23. 118 Burkina Faso 0 1000 ha compare
  24. 118 Burundi 0 1000 ha compare
  25. 118 Cabo Verde 0 1000 ha compare
  26. 118 Canada 0 1000 ha compare
  27. 118 Chad 0 1000 ha compare
  28. 118 Channel Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  29. 118 Chile 0 1000 ha compare
  30. 118 Cook Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  31. 118 Croatia 0 1000 ha compare
  32. 118 Cyprus 0 1000 ha compare
  33. 118 Czechia 0 1000 ha compare
  34. 118 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 ha compare
  35. 118 Denmark 0 1000 ha compare
  36. 118 Estonia 0 1000 ha compare
  37. 118 Eswatini 0 1000 ha compare
  38. 118 Ethiopia 0 1000 ha compare
  39. 118 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 1000 ha compare
  40. 118 Faroe Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  41. 118 Finland 0 1000 ha compare
  42. 118 France 0 1000 ha compare
  43. 118 French Southern Territories 0 1000 ha compare
  44. 118 Georgia 0 1000 ha compare
  45. 118 Germany 0 1000 ha compare
  46. 118 Gibraltar 0 1000 ha compare
  47. 118 Greece 0 1000 ha compare
  48. 118 Greenland 0 1000 ha compare
  49. 118 Guam 0 1000 ha compare
  50. 118 Heard Island and McDonald Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  51. 118 Hungary 0 1000 ha compare
  52. 118 Iceland 0 1000 ha compare
  53. 118 Iraq 0 1000 ha compare
  54. 118 Ireland 0 1000 ha compare
  55. 118 Isle of Man 0 1000 ha compare
  56. 118 Israel 0 1000 ha compare
  57. 118 Italy 0 1000 ha compare
  58. 118 Jordan 0 1000 ha compare
  59. 118 Kazakhstan 0 1000 ha compare
  60. 118 Kiribati 0 1000 ha compare
  61. 118 Kuwait 0 1000 ha compare
  62. 118 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 ha compare
  63. 118 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 ha compare
  64. 118 Latvia 0 1000 ha compare
  65. 118 Lebanon 0 1000 ha compare
  66. 118 Lesotho 0 1000 ha compare
  67. 118 Libya 0 1000 ha compare
  68. 118 Liechtenstein 0 1000 ha compare
  69. 118 Lithuania 0 1000 ha compare
  70. 118 Luxembourg 0 1000 ha compare
  71. 118 Malawi 0 1000 ha compare
  72. 118 Maldives 0 1000 ha compare
  73. 118 Mali 0 1000 ha compare
  74. 118 Malta 0 1000 ha compare
  75. 118 Marshall Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  76. 118 Monaco 0 1000 ha compare
  77. 118 Mongolia 0 1000 ha compare
  78. 118 Montenegro 0 1000 ha compare
  79. 118 Morocco 0 1000 ha compare
  80. 118 Namibia 0 1000 ha compare
  81. 118 Naoero 0 1000 ha compare
  82. 118 Nepal 0 1000 ha compare
  83. 118 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 ha compare
  84. 118 Niger 0 1000 ha compare
  85. 118 Niue 0 1000 ha compare
  86. 118 Norfolk Island 0 1000 ha compare
  87. 118 North Macedonia 0 1000 ha compare
  88. 118 Norway 0 1000 ha compare
  89. 118 Oman 0 1000 ha compare
  90. 118 Palestine 0 1000 ha compare
  91. 118 Paraguay 0 1000 ha compare
  92. 118 Pitcairn 0 1000 ha compare
  93. 118 Poland 0 1000 ha compare
  94. 118 Portugal 0 1000 ha compare
  95. 118 Republic of Korea 0 1000 ha compare
  96. 118 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 ha compare
  97. 118 Romania 0 1000 ha compare
  98. 118 Russian Federation 0 1000 ha compare
  99. 118 Rwanda 0 1000 ha compare
  100. 118 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 0 1000 ha compare
  101. 118 San Marino 0 1000 ha compare
  102. 118 Serbia 0 1000 ha compare
  103. 118 Serbia and Montenegro 0 1000 ha compare
  104. 118 Slovakia 0 1000 ha compare
  105. 118 Slovenia 0 1000 ha compare
  106. 118 South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  107. 118 South Sudan 0 1000 ha compare
  108. 118 Spain 0 1000 ha compare
  109. 118 Sweden 0 1000 ha compare
  110. 118 Switzerland 0 1000 ha compare
  111. 118 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 ha compare
  112. 118 Tajikistan 0 1000 ha compare
  113. 118 Tunisia 0 1000 ha compare
  114. 118 Türkiye 0 1000 ha compare
  115. 118 Turkmenistan 0 1000 ha compare
  116. 118 Tuvalu 0 1000 ha compare
  117. 118 Uganda 0 1000 ha compare
  118. 118 Ukraine 0 1000 ha compare
  119. 118 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 ha compare
  120. 118 United States Minor Outlying Islands 0 1000 ha compare
  121. 118 Uruguay 0 1000 ha compare
  122. 118 Uzbekistan 0 1000 ha compare
  123. 118 Western Sahara 0 1000 ha compare
  124. 118 Zambia 0 1000 ha compare
  125. 118 Zimbabwe 0 1000 ha compare

See the full ranking of 270 places →

More environment data for Tokelau

All data for Tokelau →

Frequently asked questions

What is mangroves — area from cci_lc in Tokelau?
Mangroves — area from cci_lc in Tokelau was 0 1000 ha in 2022, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest mangroves — area from cci_lc recorded in Tokelau?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha in 1992.
What is the lowest mangroves — area from cci_lc recorded in Tokelau?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha in 1992.
How does Tokelau rank for mangroves — area from cci_lc?
Tokelau ranks 118th out of 241 countries with data for 2022.
Where does this Tokelau data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Mangroves — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Mangroves — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.