Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre was 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in Mt CO2e per square kilometre.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of up 1.9% on the previous year and up 5.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, in 1971.
Costa Rica ranks 55th of 203 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 54 years of available data.
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1972 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1973 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1974 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1975 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1977 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1978 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1979 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1980 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1981 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1982 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1983 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1985 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1986 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1988 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1990 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1992 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1993 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1994 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1995 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1996 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1997 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1998 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1999 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2001 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2002 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2003 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2004 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2005 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2006 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2007 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2008 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2009 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2010 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2011 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2013 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2015 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2020 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2022 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | +1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 52 Bulgaria 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
- 53 Burundi 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
- 54 Greece 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
- 56 Philippines 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
- 57 North Korea 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
- 58 Malaysia 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre compare
More environment data for Costa Rica
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 2.9 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 2.71 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.257 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.61 °C (2025)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 0.401 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
- Methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Costa Rica rank for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre?
- Costa Rica ranks 55th out of 203 countries with data for 2023.
- Is methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.