Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP in Pakistan
Pakistan: Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP in Pakistan, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp in Pakistan is 0 t per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.0% on the previous year and down 77.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp in Pakistan peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1974 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 1964.
That places Pakistan 42nd out of 175 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -82.3% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.4% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +932.8% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +351.8% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -56.1% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +85.6% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -53.7% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1911.9% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +91.6% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +54.8% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +32.1% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -84.8% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -32.4% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +143.3% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +117.4% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +35.4% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -21.8% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +38.4% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +12.2% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +20.1% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +113.0% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -43.2% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -28.6% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.5% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +8.5% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +28.9% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +7.9% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.4% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +23.4% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -26.3% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -21.5% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -47.3% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 2.5× the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 4.9× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP in Pakistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1971 | +1911.9% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1965 | +932.8% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1966 | +351.8% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 39 Estonia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 40 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 41 North Macedonia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 43 South Africa 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 44 Morocco 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 45 Jamaica 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Pakistan
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -10.53 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -7.64 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.373 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.58 °C (2025)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 2.72 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) -1.74 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp in Pakistan?
- Newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp in Pakistan was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1974.
- What is the lowest newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- How does Pakistan rank for newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp?
- Pakistan ranks 42nd out of 175 countries with data for 2024.
- Is newsprint — import quantity, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 77.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Newsprint — Import quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Newsprint — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Newsprint — Import quantity ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Newsprint — Import quantity Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Newsprint — Import quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.