Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate was 38.67 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Ecuador is 38.67 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 823.1% on the previous year and down 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at 212.9 % change on previous year in 1972 and was at its lowest, -59.19 % change on previous year, in 1964.
Ecuador ranks 28th of 209 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | -9.01 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 51.86 % change on previous year | -675.4% |
| 1964 | -59.19 % change on previous year | -214.1% |
| 1965 | 63.88 % change on previous year | -207.9% |
| 1966 | 17.24 % change on previous year | -73.0% |
| 1967 | 7.46 % change on previous year | -56.7% |
| 1968 | 55.26 % change on previous year | +640.4% |
| 1969 | 6.64 % change on previous year | -88.0% |
| 1970 | -8.38 % change on previous year | -226.1% |
| 1971 | -53.75 % change on previous year | +541.8% |
| 1972 | 212.9 % change on previous year | -496.1% |
| 1973 | -7.21 % change on previous year | -103.4% |
| 1974 | -6.67 % change on previous year | -7.5% |
| 1975 | -20.21 % change on previous year | +203.0% |
| 1976 | 186.83 % change on previous year | -1024.4% |
| 1977 | -15.82 % change on previous year | -108.5% |
| 1978 | -36.14 % change on previous year | +128.4% |
| 1979 | 100.27 % change on previous year | -377.4% |
| 1980 | -12.22 % change on previous year | -112.2% |
| 1981 | 2.96 % change on previous year | -124.2% |
| 1982 | 12.99 % change on previous year | +338.4% |
| 1983 | -33.01 % change on previous year | -354.1% |
| 1984 | -18.32 % change on previous year | -44.5% |
| 1985 | -25.42 % change on previous year | +38.8% |
| 1986 | 175.61 % change on previous year | -790.7% |
| 1987 | -16.83 % change on previous year | -109.6% |
| 1988 | 34.87 % change on previous year | -307.2% |
| 1989 | -44.19 % change on previous year | -226.7% |
| 1990 | 36.11 % change on previous year | -181.7% |
| 1991 | 22.96 % change on previous year | -36.4% |
| 1992 | 25.73 % change on previous year | +12.1% |
| 1993 | -47.19 % change on previous year | -283.5% |
| 1994 | 25 % change on previous year | -153.0% |
| 1995 | 20 % change on previous year | -20.0% |
| 1996 | 25 % change on previous year | +25.0% |
| 1997 | 33 % change on previous year | +32.0% |
| 1998 | 10.55 % change on previous year | -68.0% |
| 1999 | 55.52 % change on previous year | +426.0% |
| 2000 | -16.33 % change on previous year | -129.4% |
| 2001 | -19.46 % change on previous year | +19.2% |
| 2002 | 27.46 % change on previous year | -241.1% |
| 2003 | -15.17 % change on previous year | -155.2% |
| 2004 | 97.61 % change on previous year | -743.3% |
| 2005 | -58.93 % change on previous year | -160.4% |
| 2006 | 132.16 % change on previous year | -324.3% |
| 2007 | -12.17 % change on previous year | -109.2% |
| 2008 | -0.7374 % change on previous year | -93.9% |
| 2009 | -49.31 % change on previous year | +6586.3% |
| 2010 | 144.26 % change on previous year | -392.6% |
| 2011 | 4.66 % change on previous year | -96.8% |
| 2012 | -19.86 % change on previous year | -526.5% |
| 2013 | -5.41 % change on previous year | -72.8% |
| 2014 | 39.56 % change on previous year | -831.0% |
| 2015 | -22.59 % change on previous year | -157.1% |
| 2016 | 14.4 % change on previous year | -163.7% |
| 2017 | 23.85 % change on previous year | +65.6% |
| 2018 | 12.61 % change on previous year | -47.1% |
| 2019 | -18.19 % change on previous year | -244.2% |
| 2020 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2022 | 5.15 % change on previous year | — |
| 2023 | -5.35 % change on previous year | -203.7% |
| 2024 | 38.67 % change on previous year | -823.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | -6586.3% | -0.7374 % change on previous year | -49.31 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.77 % change on previous year | -59.19 % change on previous year | 63.88 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 35.18 % change on previous year | -53.75 % change on previous year | 212.9 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.64 % change on previous year | -44.19 % change on previous year | 175.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.67 % change on previous year | -47.19 % change on previous year | 55.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.51 % change on previous year | -58.93 % change on previous year | 132.16 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.33 % change on previous year | -22.59 % change on previous year | 144.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.7 % change on previous year | -5.35 % change on previous year | 38.67 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 25 Argentina 42.53 % change on previous year compare
- 26 Guatemala 41.09 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Oman 40.13 % change on previous year compare
- 29 Hungary 37.05 % change on previous year compare
- 30 Ethiopia 36.89 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Papua New Guinea 36.6 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled 156,985 t (2024)
- Country area — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Country area — Area, per unit of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Country area — Area, per capita 0.0014 1000 ha per person (2024)
- Land area — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Ecuador was 38.67 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 212.9 % change on previous year in 1972.
- What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -59.19 % change on previous year in 1964.
- How does Ecuador rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 28th out of 209 countries with data for 2024.
- Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.