Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro

Serbia and Montenegro: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate was -18.05 % change on previous year in 2005. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2005)
-18.05 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 159.2%
World rank
160th
of 209 countries
All-time high
117.67 % change on previous year
in 2002
All-time low
-31.43 % change on previous year
in 1997
Years of data
9
1997–2005

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, 1997–2005

-500501001997200120051997: -31.4 % change on previous year1998: 4.2 % change on previous year1999: 16 % change on previous year2000: 0 % change on previous year2001: 22.1 % change on previous year2002: 117.7 % change on previous year2003: 11.4 % change on previous year2004: 30.5 % change on previous year2005: -18.1 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Serbia and Montenegro recorded -18.05 % change on previous year for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in 2005.

The figure is down 159.2% on the previous year and up 42.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 117.67 % change on previous year in 2002 and was at its lowest, -31.43 % change on previous year, in 1997.

That places Serbia and Montenegro 160th out of 209 countries with data for 2005, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, year by year

Annual values for Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, 1997 to 2005.
Year % change on previous year Change
1997 -31.43 % change on previous year
1998 4.17 % change on previous year -113.3%
1999 16 % change on previous year +284.0%
2000 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2001 22.07 % change on previous year
2002 117.67 % change on previous year +433.2%
2003 11.43 % change on previous year -90.3%
2004 30.51 % change on previous year +167.0%
2005 -18.05 % change on previous year -159.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -3.75 % change on previous year -31.43 % change on previous year 16 % change on previous year 3
2000s 27.27 % change on previous year -18.05 % change on previous year 117.67 % change on previous year 6

Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro

  1. 157 Luxembourg -13.47 % change on previous year
  2. 158 Fiji -15.8 % change on previous year compare
  3. 159 Romania -18.03 % change on previous year compare
  4. 161 Yugoslav SFR -18.79 % change on previous year
  5. 162 Israel -19.25 % change on previous year compare
  6. 163 Portugal -19.85 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 240 places →

More environment data for Serbia and Montenegro

All data for Serbia and Montenegro →

Frequently asked questions

What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro?
Nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro was -18.05 % change on previous year in 2005, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
The highest recorded value was 117.67 % change on previous year in 2002.
What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
The lowest recorded value was -31.43 % change on previous year in 1997.
How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 160th out of 209 countries with data for 2005.
Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate rising or falling in Serbia and Montenegro?
Over the last ten years it is up 42.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/">Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.