Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Central America
Central America: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled was 437,658 t in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Central America, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t.
Analysis
Central America recorded 437,658 t for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 31.2% on the previous year and up 30.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Central America peaked at 538,095 t in 2020 and was at its lowest, 19,988 t, in 1962.
Central America ranks 22nd of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled in Central America, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 20,770 t | — |
| 1962 | 19,988 t | -3.8% |
| 1963 | 23,569 t | +17.9% |
| 1964 | 26,808 t | +13.7% |
| 1965 | 27,822 t | +3.8% |
| 1966 | 42,145 t | +51.5% |
| 1967 | 49,521 t | +17.5% |
| 1968 | 65,515 t | +32.3% |
| 1969 | 55,063 t | -16.0% |
| 1970 | 54,704 t | -0.7% |
| 1971 | 62,726 t | +14.7% |
| 1972 | 76,396 t | +21.8% |
| 1973 | 103,210 t | +35.1% |
| 1974 | 101,866 t | -1.3% |
| 1975 | 109,459 t | +7.5% |
| 1976 | 121,269 t | +10.8% |
| 1977 | 119,218 t | -1.7% |
| 1978 | 124,761 t | +4.6% |
| 1979 | 131,365 t | +5.3% |
| 1980 | 144,676 t | +10.1% |
| 1981 | 130,182 t | -10.0% |
| 1982 | 133,015 t | +2.2% |
| 1983 | 123,045 t | -7.5% |
| 1984 | 155,833 t | +26.6% |
| 1985 | 146,078 t | -6.3% |
| 1986 | 129,677 t | -11.2% |
| 1987 | 153,902 t | +18.7% |
| 1988 | 166,138 t | +8.0% |
| 1989 | 168,436 t | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 147,179 t | -12.6% |
| 1991 | 159,690 t | +8.5% |
| 1992 | 178,019 t | +11.5% |
| 1993 | 159,800 t | -10.2% |
| 1994 | 160,100 t | +0.2% |
| 1995 | 140,300 t | -12.4% |
| 1996 | 220,976 t | +57.5% |
| 1997 | 351,206 t | +58.9% |
| 1998 | 313,476 t | -10.7% |
| 1999 | 326,903 t | +4.3% |
| 2000 | 340,774 t | +4.2% |
| 2001 | 303,519 t | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 283,007 t | -6.8% |
| 2003 | 308,562 t | +9.0% |
| 2004 | 345,617 t | +12.0% |
| 2005 | 267,277 t | -22.7% |
| 2006 | 314,011 t | +17.5% |
| 2007 | 354,865 t | +13.0% |
| 2008 | 304,373 t | -14.2% |
| 2009 | 320,399 t | +5.3% |
| 2010 | 393,810 t | +22.9% |
| 2011 | 393,497 t | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 390,812 t | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 403,744 t | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 334,734 t | -17.1% |
| 2015 | 396,458 t | +18.4% |
| 2016 | 362,448 t | -8.6% |
| 2017 | 494,655 t | +36.5% |
| 2018 | 499,824 t | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 427,801 t | -14.4% |
| 2020 | 538,095 t | +25.8% |
| 2021 | 493,195 t | -8.3% |
| 2022 | 436,946 t | -11.4% |
| 2023 | 333,510 t | -23.7% |
| 2024 | 437,658 t | +31.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36,800 t | 19,988 t | 65,515 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 100,497 t | 54,704 t | 131,365 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 145,098 t | 123,045 t | 168,436 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 215,765 t | 140,300 t | 351,206 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 314,240 t | 267,277 t | 354,865 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 409,778 t | 334,734 t | 499,824 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 447,881 t | 333,510 t | 538,095 t | 5 |
Countries ranked near Central America
More environment data for Central America
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.47 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.47 Percentage change (2025)
- Temperature change 1.58 °C (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.211 °C (2025)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Annual growth US$ 2.58 % (2024)
- Wood fuel — Production 83.65 million m3 (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Share of GDP US$ 3.69 % (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Share of GDP US$ 4.26 % (2024)
- Industrial roundwood — Export quantity 321,062 m3 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Central America?
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled in Central America was 437,658 t in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled recorded in Central America?
- The highest recorded value was 538,095 t in 2020.
- What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled recorded in Central America?
- The lowest recorded value was 19,988 t in 1962.
- How does Central America rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Central America ranks 22nd out of 31 groups with data for 2024.
- Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled rising or falling in Central America?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central America data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.