Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP in Belgium
Belgium: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP in Belgium, 2002–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Belgium recorded 0 t per US$ of GDP for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp in 2024.
The figure is down 3.0% on the previous year and down 28.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp in Belgium peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
That places Belgium 107th out of 171 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP in Belgium, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -59.6% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +68.5% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +24.4% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.1% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.8% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +21.9% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -26.2% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
Belgium compared with similar countries
- Belgium's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (60 countries reporting)
- Belgium's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 65% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP in Belgium changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | +68.5% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 2008 | -59.6% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
More environment data for Belgium
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -5.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -6.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.574 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.19 °C (2025)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 0.5577 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate 0.0605 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp in Belgium?
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp in Belgium was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2002.
- What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Belgium rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 107th out of 171 countries with data for 2024.
- Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.