Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production was 5.67 g/Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan, 1992–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in g/Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan is 5.67 g/Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 11.1% on the previous year and up 68.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan peaked at 7.91 g/Int$ in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.72 g/Int$, in 2003.
That places Uzbekistan 74th out of 211 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | g/Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 5.73 g/Int$ | — |
| 1993 | 5.73 g/Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 4.9 g/Int$ | -14.5% |
| 1995 | 4.8 g/Int$ | -2.0% |
| 1996 | 7.91 g/Int$ | +64.8% |
| 1997 | 7.59 g/Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1998 | 4.14 g/Int$ | -45.5% |
| 1999 | 1.56 g/Int$ | -62.3% |
| 2000 | 0.8 g/Int$ | -48.7% |
| 2001 | 3.38 g/Int$ | +322.5% |
| 2002 | 1.4 g/Int$ | -58.6% |
| 2003 | 0.72 g/Int$ | -48.6% |
| 2004 | 1.98 g/Int$ | +175.0% |
| 2005 | 1.86 g/Int$ | -6.1% |
| 2006 | 2.16 g/Int$ | +16.1% |
| 2007 | 2.64 g/Int$ | +22.2% |
| 2008 | 1.96 g/Int$ | -25.8% |
| 2009 | 2.47 g/Int$ | +26.0% |
| 2010 | 2.29 g/Int$ | -7.3% |
| 2011 | 2.16 g/Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2012 | 2.4 g/Int$ | +11.1% |
| 2013 | 3.44 g/Int$ | +43.3% |
| 2014 | 3.37 g/Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2015 | 3.3 g/Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2016 | 3.26 g/Int$ | -1.2% |
| 2017 | 3.41 g/Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2018 | 2.57 g/Int$ | -24.6% |
| 2019 | 6.34 g/Int$ | +146.7% |
| 2020 | 4.62 g/Int$ | -27.1% |
| 2021 | 5.54 g/Int$ | +19.9% |
| 2022 | 6.67 g/Int$ | +20.4% |
| 2023 | 6.38 g/Int$ | -4.3% |
| 2024 | 5.67 g/Int$ | -11.1% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 5.67 g/Int$ is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.12 g/Int$, 2.7× the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 5.67 g/Int$ is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 5.67 g/Int$, 100% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +322.5% | 0.8 g/Int$ | 3.38 g/Int$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.29 g/Int$ | 1.56 g/Int$ | 7.91 g/Int$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 1.94 g/Int$ | 0.72 g/Int$ | 3.38 g/Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.25 g/Int$ | 2.16 g/Int$ | 6.34 g/Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.78 g/Int$ | 4.62 g/Int$ | 6.67 g/Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 71 Republic of Korea 5.99 g/Int$ compare
- 72 Israel 5.96 g/Int$ compare
- 73 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5.68 g/Int$ compare
- 75 Sweden 5.56 g/Int$ compare
- 76 Solomon Islands 5.53 g/Int$ compare
- 77 Belgium 5.52 g/Int$ compare
More environment data for Uzbekistan
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -18.62 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -12.65 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.74 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.76 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -0.485 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 7.63 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate 0.4364 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan?
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production in Uzbekistan was 5.67 g/Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 7.91 g/Int$ in 1996.
- What is the lowest nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.72 g/Int$ in 2003.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production?
- Uzbekistan ranks 74th out of 211 countries with data for 2024.
- Is nutrient potash k2o (total) — use per value of agricultural production rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 68.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf