Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador
Ecuador: Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area was 50.04 kg/ha in 2023. ▲ Rising
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kg/ha.
Analysis
In 2023, outputs — cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador stood at 50.04 kg/ha.
The figure is up 2.6% on the previous year and up 33.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, outputs — cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador peaked at 50.63 kg/ha in 2015 and was at its lowest, 15.9 kg/ha, in 1983.
Ecuador ranks 23rd of 186 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | kg/ha | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 20.51 kg/ha | — |
| 1962 | 20.44 kg/ha | -0.3% |
| 1963 | 20.77 kg/ha | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 24.54 kg/ha | +18.2% |
| 1965 | 25.86 kg/ha | +5.4% |
| 1966 | 23.78 kg/ha | -8.1% |
| 1967 | 23.09 kg/ha | -2.9% |
| 1968 | 23.97 kg/ha | +3.8% |
| 1969 | 23.01 kg/ha | -4.0% |
| 1970 | 22.17 kg/ha | -3.7% |
| 1971 | 21.61 kg/ha | -2.5% |
| 1972 | 19.84 kg/ha | -8.2% |
| 1973 | 19.51 kg/ha | -1.7% |
| 1974 | 21.25 kg/ha | +8.9% |
| 1975 | 20.94 kg/ha | -1.5% |
| 1976 | 19.86 kg/ha | -5.1% |
| 1977 | 20.95 kg/ha | +5.4% |
| 1978 | 19.38 kg/ha | -7.5% |
| 1979 | 18.76 kg/ha | -3.2% |
| 1980 | 20.98 kg/ha | +11.8% |
| 1981 | 20.02 kg/ha | -4.6% |
| 1982 | 19.54 kg/ha | -2.4% |
| 1983 | 15.9 kg/ha | -18.6% |
| 1984 | 17.3 kg/ha | +8.8% |
| 1985 | 19.31 kg/ha | +11.6% |
| 1986 | 20.04 kg/ha | +3.8% |
| 1987 | 19.8 kg/ha | -1.2% |
| 1988 | 20.89 kg/ha | +5.5% |
| 1989 | 21.91 kg/ha | +4.9% |
| 1990 | 22.44 kg/ha | +2.4% |
| 1991 | 19.38 kg/ha | -13.6% |
| 1992 | 23.08 kg/ha | +19.1% |
| 1993 | 24.33 kg/ha | +5.4% |
| 1994 | 26.74 kg/ha | +9.9% |
| 1995 | 26.53 kg/ha | -0.8% |
| 1996 | 27.68 kg/ha | +4.3% |
| 1997 | 31.06 kg/ha | +12.2% |
| 1998 | 29.28 kg/ha | -5.7% |
| 1999 | 35.2 kg/ha | +20.2% |
| 2000 | 26.61 kg/ha | -24.4% |
| 2001 | 36.03 kg/ha | +35.4% |
| 2002 | 34.41 kg/ha | -4.5% |
| 2003 | 38.92 kg/ha | +13.1% |
| 2004 | 37.42 kg/ha | -3.8% |
| 2005 | 38.21 kg/ha | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 38.92 kg/ha | +1.9% |
| 2007 | 40.88 kg/ha | +5.0% |
| 2008 | 42.22 kg/ha | +3.3% |
| 2009 | 44.73 kg/ha | +5.9% |
| 2010 | 46.7 kg/ha | +4.4% |
| 2011 | 44.38 kg/ha | -5.0% |
| 2012 | 43.5 kg/ha | -2.0% |
| 2013 | 37.49 kg/ha | -13.8% |
| 2014 | 49.23 kg/ha | +31.3% |
| 2015 | 50.63 kg/ha | +2.8% |
| 2016 | 46.53 kg/ha | -8.1% |
| 2017 | 46.9 kg/ha | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 47.35 kg/ha | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 47.23 kg/ha | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 46.63 kg/ha | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 49.97 kg/ha | +7.2% |
| 2022 | 48.77 kg/ha | -2.4% |
| 2023 | 50.04 kg/ha | +2.6% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 50.04 kg/ha is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.46 kg/ha, 2.0× the median. (51 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 50.04 kg/ha is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 26.37 kg/ha, 1.9× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.88 kg/ha | 20.44 kg/ha | 25.86 kg/ha | 9 |
| 1970s | 20.43 kg/ha | 18.76 kg/ha | 22.17 kg/ha | 10 |
| 1980s | 19.57 kg/ha | 15.9 kg/ha | 21.91 kg/ha | 10 |
| 1990s | 26.57 kg/ha | 19.38 kg/ha | 35.2 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2000s | 37.83 kg/ha | 26.61 kg/ha | 44.73 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2010s | 45.99 kg/ha | 37.49 kg/ha | 50.63 kg/ha | 10 |
| 2020s | 48.85 kg/ha | 46.63 kg/ha | 50.04 kg/ha | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -0.5742 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 1.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.14 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is outputs — cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador?
- Outputs — cropland potassium per unit area in Ecuador was 50.04 kg/ha in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest outputs — cropland potassium per unit area recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 50.63 kg/ha in 2015.
- What is the lowest outputs — cropland potassium per unit area recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.9 kg/ha in 1983.
- How does Ecuador rank for outputs — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is outputs — cropland potassium per unit area rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Outputs — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).