PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim in Samoa
Samoa: PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim was 0.0% in 2017. β¬ Flat
PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim in Samoa, 1990β2017
Source: Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Measured in % of total.
Analysis
The most recent figure for pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim in Samoa is 0.0%, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Over the whole period, pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim in Samoa peaked at 0.0% in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1990.
That places Samoa 92nd out of 194 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8 |
Countries ranked near Samoa
- 89 United States 0.0% compare
- 90 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 91 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 92 Albania 0.0% compare
- 92 American Samoa 0.0% compare
- 92 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 92 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0% compare
- 92 Australia 0.0% compare
- 92 Austria 0.0% compare
- 92 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 92 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 92 Belgium 0.0% compare
- 92 Belize 0.0% compare
- 92 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 92 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 92 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 92 Brunei Darussalam 0.0% compare
- 92 Cambodia 0.0% compare
- 92 Canada 0.0% compare
- 92 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 92 Comoros 0.0% compare
- 92 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
- 92 Croatia 0.0% compare
- 92 Cuba 0.0% compare
- 92 Cyprus 0.0% compare
- 92 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 92 Denmark 0.0% compare
- 92 Dominica 0.0% compare
- 92 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 92 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 92 El Salvador 0.0% compare
- 92 Estonia 0.0% compare
- 92 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 92 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 92 Finland 0.0% compare
- 92 France 0.0% compare
- 92 Germany 0.0% compare
- 92 Greenland 0.0% compare
- 92 Grenada 0.0% compare
- 92 Guam 0.0% compare
- 92 Guatemala 0.0% compare
- 92 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 92 Guinea-Bissau 0.0% compare
- 92 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 92 Haiti 0.0% compare
- 92 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 92 Hungary 0.0% compare
- 92 Iceland 0.0% compare
- 92 Ireland 0.0% compare
- 92 Italy 0.0% compare
- 92 Jamaica 0.0% compare
- 92 Japan 0.0% compare
- 92 Kazakhstan 0.0% compare
- 92 Kiribati 0.0% compare
- 92 Korea 0.0% compare
- 92 Latvia 0.0% compare
- 92 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 92 Lithuania 0.0% compare
- 92 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 92 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 92 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 92 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 92 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 92 Malta 0.0% compare
- 92 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 92 Mauritius 0.0% compare
- 92 Micronesia 0.0% compare
- 92 Moldova 0.0% compare
- 92 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 92 Namibia 0.0% compare
- 92 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 92 New Zealand 0.0% compare
- 92 Nicaragua 0.0% compare
- 92 Northern Mariana Islands 0.0% compare
- 92 Norway 0.0% compare
- 92 Panama 0.0% compare
- 92 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 92 Paraguay 0.0% compare
- 92 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 92 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 92 Puerto Rico 0.0% compare
- 92 Romania 0.0% compare
- 92 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 92 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 92 Singapore 0.0% compare
- 92 Slovak Republic 0.0% compare
- 92 Slovenia 0.0% compare
- 92 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 92 Spain 0.0% compare
- 92 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 92 Saint Lucia 0.0% compare
- 92 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 92 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 92 Sweden 0.0% compare
- 92 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 92 Timor-Leste 0.0% compare
- 92 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 92 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 92 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 92 United Kingdom 0.0% compare
- 92 Uruguay 0.0% compare
- 92 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 92 Venezuela 0.0% compare
- 92 United States Virgin Islands 0.0% compare
- 92 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More environment data for Samoa
- Historical exposure to drought β Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3482 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought β Cropland soil moisture anomaly 0.3183 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.23 Β°C (2025)
- Temperature change 0.919 Β°C (2025)
- Exposure to drought β Land soil moisture anomaly 0.7823 Percentage change (2024)
- Exposure to drought β Cropland soil moisture anomaly 0.7346 Percentage change (2024)
- Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified β Import value 77.01 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified β Import value 0.0007 1000 USD per person (2024)
- Other paper and paperboard, not elsewhere specified β Import value 154 1000 USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim in Samoa?
- Pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim in Samoa was 0.0% in 2017, according to Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).
- What is the highest pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim recorded in Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1990.
- What is the lowest pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim recorded in Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1990.
- How does Samoa rank for pm2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding who interim?
- Samoa ranks 92nd out of 194 countries with data for 2017.
- Where does this Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published as part of PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percent of population exposed to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 that exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) Interim Target 1 (IT-1) is defined as the portion of a countryβs population living in places where mean annual concentrations of PM2.5 are greater than 35 micrograms per cubic meter. The Air Quality Guideline (AQG) of 10 micrograms per cubic meter is recommended by the WHO as the lower end of the range of concentrations over which adverse health effects due to PM2.5 exposure have been observed.